Is Rahner Obsolete? What His Critics Get Wrong

By Bacik, James | Commonweal, January 28, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Is Rahner Obsolete? What His Critics Get Wrong

Bacik, James, Commonweal

It was 1974. Karl Rahner, SJ, sat across from me in his small, book-lined room in the Jesuit residence near Munich. As part of a wide-ranging conversation, I asked the renowned Vatican II theologian what his most profound religious experience had been. "Immersion in the incomprehensibility of God and the death of Christ," he replied. Had this been a mystical experience that occurred during meditation? "No," he answered quickly, firmly. "In life, in the ordinary things."

Rahner (1904-84) was doubtless one of the most important Catholic theologians since Aquinas and Bonaventure in the thirteenth century. It would be tough to keep him off the list of the ten most influential theologians in church history. He played a crucial role in drafting the documents of Vatican II, and his creative reinterpretation of the Christian faith in dialogue with the modern world produced a new theological paradigm that made the faith more credible and inspiring for many, including me. And yet here he was, a man known for building complex theological systems, articulating a simple spiritual truth: the experience of God's grace in everyday life, in "ordinary things."

Ordinary is not the first word most readers of Rahner would use to describe his thinking--or his writing. In fact, his famously difficult theological tracts (it's said they're "easier in translation") have been the butt of jokes for decades by students and scholars alike. He was, as many have noted, a theologian's theologian. Does that mean his theology doesn't have legs, that it won't endure? Recently, some critics have said as much.

Neoconservative writer George Weigel, for example, has claimed that "the future of Catholic theology will not be Rahnerian." According to Weigel, Rahner's writings were too narrowly directed to German academics and fail to resonate with the broader Christian audience. Likewise, followers of the prolific Swiss theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar, echoing their mentor, criticize Rahner for putting too much emphasis on the orientation of all human beings to the holy mystery rather than on the distinctive message of Christianity centered on the concrete historical figure Jesus of Nazareth.

Such criticisms are neither convincing nor accurate. Rahner's extensive writings on the spiritual life provide a strong response to the neoconservative and Balthasarian critiques, offering proof of Rahner's enduring role in theology. Yes, it's possible to read Rahner's academic articles in Theological Investigations and wonder if his thought can move a popular audience. Still, it's hard to read his prayers in Encounters with Silence and not be touched in the heart and the head. Clearly, his Foundations of Christian Faith can provide a raft of fodder for critics in search of limpid prose, and might lead some to conclude (mistakenly, I believe) that Rahner's transcendental philosophy overwhelmed the particularity of the gospel message. Yet any reader who has engaged Rahner's homilies in The Great Church Year cannot but be moved by his profoundly Christocentric piety. In fact, it is Rahner's spiritual writings that reveal the wellspring of his whole theology, not merely one aspect of it, and highlight the dynamic interplay between his philosophy of human existence and the particularity of Christianity. In this mutual exchange, the gospel remains norm and judge, as Rahner explicitly affirmed and consistently practiced.

Rahner's insistence on the organic unity between theology and spirituality constitutes, I believe, his lasting contribution to the spiritual quest in the twenty-first century. In his own time, Rahner recognized the great dangers of the "rift, all too common, even today, between lived piety and abstract theology." Such perils are intensified in our postmodern world, which celebrates multiple perspectives and fosters superficial, faddish approaches to spirituality. We have even witnessed the growth of a distinct academic discipline called "spirituality," which ought to engage systematic theology as its primary dialogue partner, but often fails to do so.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Is Rahner Obsolete? What His Critics Get Wrong


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?