Spasmodic Affections: Poetry, Pathology, and the Spasmodic Hero

By Blair, Kirstie | Victorian Poetry, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Spasmodic Affections: Poetry, Pathology, and the Spasmodic Hero


Blair, Kirstie, Victorian Poetry


IN 1787, MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT WROTE TO HER SISTER EVERINA:

   Don't smile when I tell you that I am tormented with spasms.... I
   know they all arise from disordered nerves, that are injured beyond
   a possibility of receiving any aid from medicine--There is no cure
   for a broken heart! (1)

Although she stresses her genuine suffering from a combination of mental and physical factors, Wollstonecraft makes it clear that spasms are slightly comic symptoms, presumably in their bathetic relation to tragic heartbreak. Her deliberate emphasis on the emotional and affective cause of her illness suggests she is exploiting the perceived link between female emotion and bodily suffering: in retrospect, the reader might also smile at the idea that Wollstonecraft, later notable for brilliantly scornful dissections of the cultural relation between women and sickness, might have fallen prey to such a peculiarly feminine illness herself. Wollstonecraft was writing over sixty years before "spasm" and "spasmodic" became terms used to denote a particular literary movement, yet this letter is significant because it highlights accepted ideas about the relation between nervousness, heartbreak, and spasmodic attacks and because it additionally considers the association between spasms and gender. These ideas, as we shall see, went on to become a subject of considerable debate in the first half of the nineteenth century, and eventually came to haunt spasmodic poetry and its practitioners.

The pathological connotations of "spasm" and "spasmodic" have received little attention in modern criticism, yet from the 1780s to the 1850s and beyond, it was precisely these connotations which would have been most familiar to readers. By exploring the unnoticed medical context of spasm, this article will suggest ways in which critical discourse about spasmodic poetry exploited medical implications of weakness, effeminacy, nervousness, and lack of will in order to trope Spasmodic poetry as pathological. The poets themselves, however, often fostered this identification by deploying language, form, and imagery which evoked the body and strongly hinted at disease. I will argue that Alexander Smith, Sydney Dobell, and J. Stanyan Bigg attempted to use the pathological "Spasmodism" of their poetry to promote a radical poetics, while simultaneously displaying considerable anxiety about the interaction between spasms, illness, and femininity. Their poems defiantly present spasms as a key feature of the natural world, as instances of physical or spiritual connection to wider forces, and as a constituent part of poetic form and rhythm. They also introduce a new kind of poetic hero, who is indeed nervous, emotional, and prone to spasmodic attacks, and thus definitely lacks key attributes of mid-Victorian manliness, but who views this less as a drawback than as an essential element of the modern poet in tune with his times. Given that the revolutionary fervor of the late 1840s, the period when Spasmodic poetry began to emerge as a genre, was itself discussed in the language of disease, this Spasmodic poet-hero could accurately claim to represent--indeed to embody--his culture.

Yet no poetic hero, whether Smith's Walter in A Life-Drama, Dobell's eponymous Balder or Bigg's Alexis in Night and the Soul (not to mention the speaker of Tennyson's Maud or Arnold's Empedocles) actually achieves success and confident self-definition in the course of a Spasmodic poem: all are undermined or betrayed by their unstable minds and/or bodies. While these poems begin with grandiose statements, they inevitably trail off into anxious and uncertain futures, often marked by disease or death. If giving in to, or welcoming, spasmodic illness seemed to offer a way into a new poetics, it also demonstrated the instability of this poetics and the dangers of practicing it--literal as well as metaphorical dangers, given that Spasmodic poetry was generally expected to create disease in the bodies of the poets themselves.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Spasmodic Affections: Poetry, Pathology, and the Spasmodic Hero
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?