Supreme Court Hears Eminent Domain Case

By Appel, Sherry Conway | Nation's Cities Weekly, February 28, 2005 | Go to article overview

Supreme Court Hears Eminent Domain Case


Appel, Sherry Conway, Nation's Cities Weekly


In cases where the power of eminent domain is used to take private property for economic development, should cities and towns adhere to some type of minimum standard to determine public benefit? That issue seemed to be at the heart of questions posed by Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States last week when they heard arguments in case of Kelo v. City of New London.

While generally voicing support for the use of eminent domain to bolster depressed economic neighborhoods, several of the Justices probed the standards that are used. "Virtually every taking has a public benefit," said Justice David H. Souter. "Why must there be a limit?"

The Kelo case was brought by several property owners who are challenging the use of eminent domain by the city of New London, Conn., to take their property as part of a proposed 90-acre redevelopment area.

For more than 15 years, New London has suffered the loss of more than 1,500 jobs as major industries closed. After years of planning, public hearings and outreach, city officials approved the construction of a waterfront development project near historic Fort Trumbull. The four-phase plan will include retail, residential and commercial space, a waterfront hotel and conference center, marinas and other public amenities. The project is expected to bring up to 2,300 jobs to unemployed New London residents and as much as $1.2 million in tax revenue for improved city services.

The National League of Cities filed a "friend of the court" brief in support of New London, recognizing that any change to the current use of eminent domain could have serious implications for cities, towns and states working to improve economic development and revitalize aging neighborhoods.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, acting as presiding judge due to the illness of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, asked, "In a city that is suffering from an enormous lack of jobs ... is there not a public use benefit?" When O'Connor asked Scott G. Bullock, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, Susette Kelp and other homeowners, what test he would apply in eminent domain cases, Bullock said, "The test should be that the government shouldn't take private property to give over to another private landowner."

Wesley W. Horton, counsel for the City of New London, refuted this suggestion. "Purely taking from one person to give to another person is not a public use," he said, citing a New Jersey court decision that rejected an effort by developer Donald Trump to use the power to build a parking lot. "But this development is a part of a long-range plan by the city," Horton said, "to be developed in phases with due public processes."

Horton argued that there shouldn't be a higher standard for dries that use eminent domain for economic development than for utilities or for transportation projects.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Supreme Court Hears Eminent Domain Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.