The Balanced Scorecard: It Remains the Management Accountant's Benchmarking Tool of Choice Well over a Decade after Its Birth, but Is It Still Up to the Job? Malcolm Smith Tests It Out

By Smith, Malcolm | Financial Management (UK), February 2005 | Go to article overview

The Balanced Scorecard: It Remains the Management Accountant's Benchmarking Tool of Choice Well over a Decade after Its Birth, but Is It Still Up to the Job? Malcolm Smith Tests It Out


Smith, Malcolm, Financial Management (UK)


Management accounting information systems cannot live on financial measures alone. They require a mix of indicators to give a more balanced view of a firm's overall performance and provide current non-financials that could predict its future financial performance. A number of methods have been proposed to achieve this (see panel), but the balanced scorecard has become the most popular one with management accountants. It has been through a number of versions, yet it's worth questioning how well it meets the needs of businesses in the 21st century.

Its first incarnation in 1992 focused unashamedly on shareholders in setting a framework that addressed non-financial measures such as customer perspectives, business processes and sustainability. In essence, its four original dimensions--financial; customer; internal; and innovation and learning--have barely changed.

It has rightly been criticised for being weak in the following areas:

* Its bias towards shareholders and failure to address the contribution of employees and suppliers.

* Its silence on the selection of specific performance measures and the role of performance targets.

* Its failure to address HR issues.

* Its failure to address strategic uncertainties of the kind that we would examine with a Pest analysis.

The performance prism (2002) seeks to address one of the main oversights of the balanced scorecard by considering the value of stakeholder groups, which include customers, staff suppliers and regulators, as well as its shareholders. The prism has three dimensions: strategies, processes and "'capabilities" (ie, people, practices and infrastructure). It takes both stakeholder satisfaction and stakeholder contribution into account. The former element identifies what the key stakeholders need from the company. The latter identifies what the firm needs from these stakeholders if it is to develop its capabilities.

Some of the prism's measures of satisfaction and contribution may be subjective in nature and the model does not address the HR issues adequately. In fact, most types of scorecard fail to get to grips with HR--a dimension where one of the biggest gaps between accounting theory and practice exists.

But the following assumptions that underpin the balanced scorecard may be more significant than its omissions:

* The assumption of a causal link between non-financial performance and financial performance. The evidence for this is not strong, but some empirical studies suggest that the adoption of non-financial performance measures will improve a firm's share value.

* The assumption that effective organisational learning, internal processes and customer relations have a positive effect on financial performance. The evidence for this is thin, although one or two studies have found a link between customer satisfaction and future profitability. There seem to be logical connections among the dimensions, but no clear causal links among the specific measures. Such relationships have yet to be shown in a convincing way. Indeed, recent research on the link between customer-related measures and financial performance suggests that there is no obvious association.

In effect, the balanced scorecard is a hierarchical model of control. It cascades down the organisation with little involvement from senior managers, implying a conflict with both employee empowerment and organisational learning. The nature of these conflicts may help to explain the implementation failures that so often occur. In 1998 Claude Lewy and Lex du Mee (1) observed that as many as 70 per cent of scorecard implementations were failing, so they proposed the following "ten commandments", based on successful implementations in the Netherlands:

1 Use the scorecard as the basis for implementing strategic goals, since its visibility makes it the ideal vehicle for doing so.

2 Ensure that your strategy is in place before developing the scorecard, since ad hoc development will encourage the wrong behaviour. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Balanced Scorecard: It Remains the Management Accountant's Benchmarking Tool of Choice Well over a Decade after Its Birth, but Is It Still Up to the Job? Malcolm Smith Tests It Out
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.