McCain's Answer

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 11, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

McCain's Answer


McCain's answer

Bob Schieffer, host of CBS' "Face the Nation," asked Sen. John McCain yesterday if he thinks President Bush's Social Security private accounts plan is dead.

Mr. McCain, an Arizona Republican who finished second to Mr. Bush in the party's presidential contest five years ago, replied: "Well, I think, first of all, to underestimate the tenacity of this president and his ability to get something done is a mistake that a lot of people have made. In fact, you might even say that I made that mistake myself in the year 2000."

Dodd's charge

Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, yesterday charged that President Bush's nominee for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations tried to intimidate intelligence analysts whose views differed from his own.

Citing "very credible" information to be presented this week at a Senate hearing on John R. Bolton's nomination, Mr. Dodd said Mr. Bolton attempted to have two intelligence analysts dismissed from their jobs because their analyses on Cuba contradicted his own position.

"If in fact he tried to have people dismissed because he did not like the analysis, then I don't think he's qualified to serve," Mr. Dodd said on ABC's "This Week."

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee plans to begin hearings on Mr. Bolton today.

Defending Bolton

"Full disclosure (OK, partial disclosure - let's not get carried away with media ethics breast-beating): John Bolton has been an occasional contributor to this magazine," William Kristol writes in an editorial in the Weekly Standard.

"He served in the late 1990s as a director of the Project for the New American Century, which I chair. And he is a friend," Mr. Kristol said.

"More than all that, though, he is an exceptional choice to serve as our next U.N. ambassador. He should be confirmed quickly and easily by the Senate. He has, after all, been confirmed for high government positions four times before. He has served in those posts with distinction during three administrations, untainted by a hint of scandal or a murmur of corner-cutting. He has been an exemplary public servant.

"He also, as it happens, supports President Bush's policies, and as undersecretary of state worked hard to advance them in the first term. So the Democratic Party, led by George Soros and the New York Times, thinks he shouldn't be permitted to continue to serve President Bush.

"Despite Soros' millions and the Times' resources, the assault on Bolton has been pathetic. What does it amount to? He's a longtime U.N. skeptic - appropriate, one would think, given the U.N.'s 'Zionism is Racism' history during the Cold War, and its ineffectiveness (to be kind) in Rwanda in the '90s and in Sudan in this decade. But he's worse than a skeptic, the critics say: He has been disrespectful of the august body in which he will represent us. Why, he once joked, 'The Secretariat Building in New York has 38 stories. If it lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference.' Well, truer words were never spoken."

Ginsberg's polemics

"[U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Ruth Bader Ginsberg gave a speech defending the Supreme Court's use of foreign law in interpreting the U.S. Constitution," National Review notes in an editorial.

" 'The notion that it is improper to look beyond the borders of the United States in grappling with hard questions has a certain kinship to the view that the U.S. Constitution is a document essentially frozen in time as of the date of its ratification,' she said. And she's right: Both of the notions are caricatures of conservative propositions that are rooted in a concern for self-government," the magazine said.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

McCain's Answer


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?