Ethnic Identity and Archaeology in the Black Sea Region of Turkey

By Erciyas, D. Burcu | Antiquity, March 2005 | Go to article overview

Ethnic Identity and Archaeology in the Black Sea Region of Turkey


Erciyas, D. Burcu, Antiquity


Introduction

While many scholars treat archaeology as if it were simply an objective search for remains of past civilizations, it is clear that, in all parts of the world, its practice has been shaped by philosophical processes as well as socio-political and economic developments (Trigger 1989). It is obvious that archaeological studies continue to be influenced greatly by contemporary political, economic and social circumstances and that any true objectivity in interpretation is achieved only with great difficulty or even not preferred anymore (Shanks & Tilley 1987). In many areas of the world a principal focus of archaeology has been the identification of ethnicity in the archaeological record. The importance of nations, national unity and self-determination first led historians, then archaeologists, to search for the greatness of their forefathers in textual and material records of the past (Trigger 1989: 174). This quest for a common ethnic identity, or origin, transcended national borders and expanded over continents.

In this paper, I will be discussing the development of archaeological studies in the Black Sea region of Turkey within the larger context of what is commonly called Anatolian Archaeology. The discussion will especially emphasize nation-building policies in the 1930s and their impact on archaeological practice.

A philosophical approach to archaeological practice in Turkey has been virtually nonexistent until very recently and even today Ozdogan's writings (1998, 2001) remain alien to general trends in general archaeological practice. Instead, scholars mostly concentrated on their own research, often only conducting excavations, collecting archaeological material, making catalogues and publishing preliminary excavation reports (Ozdogan 2002: 43). They have questioned neither their own education as archaeologists nor the social context in which they have performed archaeology. As a result, archaeological practice in Turkey remained static; in other words, the culture-historical approach of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries dominated the field. Only in the last 10 years has an increasing awareness about the value of cultural heritage and the immediate need for proper protection required archaeologists, historians and scholars from related fields to turn towards more contemporary approaches and to benefit from technological advances. Both in terms of a new understanding of cultural heritage and the application of advanced techniques, a good example is provided by the Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilisu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs conducted under the supervision of METU TACDAM (Middle East Technical University, Centre for Research and Assessment of the Historic Environment) (Tuna & Ozturk 1999; Tuna et al. 2001).

Contemporary methodology was not only embraced in practical areas such as advanced surveying methods or professional heritage management, but it also initiated a platform on which scholars could discuss the past and the future of the field of archaeology in Turkey (Yolac 2002; Ozdogan 2002; Pulhan 2002; Tekin 2002). Even so, the papers questioning archaeological practice did not go beyond being descriptive accounts of how archaeological studies began in Turkey and particularly the role of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in promoting the fields of archaeology, history and Turkish language. Topics such as ethnicity, nationalism, ideology and power in Turkish archaeology have scarcely been addressed at conferences or in journals and books (Ozdogan 1998; Erdur & Duru 2003).

This scarcity and the awareness that Turkish archaeological practice is not discussed openly as if it had an unbiased nature, forced the author to question her own study of the available archaeological resources from the Black Sea area. The scholarly literature on Black Sea archaeology indicated a dualism in the purpose of archaeological studies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ethnic Identity and Archaeology in the Black Sea Region of Turkey
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.