Constitutional Law - Freedom of the Press - Pennsylvania Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Neutral Reportage Privilege

Harvard Law Review, April 2005 | Go to article overview

Constitutional Law - Freedom of the Press - Pennsylvania Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Neutral Reportage Privilege


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FREEDOM OF THE PRESS--PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO ADOPT NEUTRAL REPORTAGE PRIVILEGE.--Norton v. Glenn, 860 A.2d 48 (Pa. 2004).

Lately, it seems as if some politicians have lost the fine art of discretion. Last June, Vice President Dick Cheney, standing on the Senate floor, used profanity during an exchange with Senator Patrick Leahy. (1) During his election campaign, Senator Tom Coburn--in remarks that have been characterized as "weird" even by commentators from his own party--discussed what he described as rampant lesbianism in parts of Oklahoma. (2) Though the media may easily inform the public of incidents like these, it is less clear that news outlets can reprint an outburst by a politician that contains defamatory content, regardless of how much the outburst might inform the public about the elected official making the statement. Recently, in Norton v. Glenn, (3) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to adopt the neutral reportage privilege, (4) which protects the "accurate and disinterested" reporting of a prominent organization's or individual's serious charge against a public figure "regardless of the reporter's private views regarding [the] validity [of the charge]." (5) In so holding, the court failed to consider properly the context of the reported comments and thereby too easily undermined the media's ability to provide the public with information about the conduct of elected officials--information vital to the effective operation of a democracy.

On April 20, 1995, the Chester County Daily Local ran a story under the headline "Slurs, insults drag town into controversy" that reported on insults lobbed among members of the Parkesburg Borough Council. (6) Specifically, the paper relayed comments made by Council Member William T. Glenn, Sr., about Council President James B. Norton III and Borough Mayor Alan M. Wolfe. (7) As the paper reported, Glenn had issued a written statement strongly implying that Norton and Wolfe were "queers and child molesters" and claiming that Norton had made a sexual advance toward him. (8) The report went on to note that Norton, when informed of these charges, had responded: "If Mr. Glenn has made comments as bizarre as that, then I feel very sad for him, and I hope he can get the help he needs." (9) Following publication of the article, Norton and Wolfe filed suit against Glenn for defamation. (10) They also named as defendants the Daily Local, its owner and publisher, and the author of the article. (11)

At trial, all of the defendants filed motions for summary judgment. (12) The trial court denied Glenn's motion in full and granted the media defendants' motions in part. (13) It held that the media defendants were protected by the neutral reportage privilege; accordingly, "the subjective awareness of the publisher, of the truth or falsity of the statement, [was] irrelevant." (14) Pursuant to this ruling, the jury determined that the media defendants were not liable for defamation. (15) The article, according to the jury, "accurately conveyed the gist of the statements Glenn made and did not imply that the Media Defendants adopted or concurred in those statements." (16) The jury found Glenn liable for defamation and awarded $10,000 in compensatory damages and $7,500 in punitive damages to each plaintiff. (17)

On appeal, the Superior Court vacated the judgment for the media defendants and remanded for a new trial. (18) In reaching this result, the court "focus[ed] on whether the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania should adopt the neutral reportage privilege" that the trial court had applied. (19) The court first emphasized that this privilege is not found in the United States Constitution, the Pennsylvania Constitution, or Pennsylvania statutory law. (20) It then traced the privilege's conception to Edwards v. National Audubon Society, (21) a Second Circuit decision that recognized a privilege for the "accurate and disinterested" reporting of charges against a public figure by a prominent organization or individual, "regardless of the reporter's private views regarding their validity. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Constitutional Law - Freedom of the Press - Pennsylvania Supreme Court Declines to Adopt Neutral Reportage Privilege
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.