Pelosi Intervenes

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 29, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Pelosi Intervenes


Pelosi intervenes

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, discouraged a handful of her members from attending a bipartisan Social Security meeting with Republicans and AARP representatives yesterday. Only two of the five invited Democrats showed up at the meeting.

"We just said we'd prefer you not go," Mrs. Pelosi said, adding that "one thing we have to have on Social Security is a united front" against private accounts Republicans want to create.

"Nancy Pelosi doesn't want a bipartisan solution to Social Security. She wants an issue for Democrat leaders to demagogue and play politics with," said Carl Forti, National Republican Congressional Committee communications director.

In the end, two Democrats - Ed Case of Hawaii and Jim Cooper of Tennessee - attended the meeting, organized by Rep. K. Michael Conaway, Texas Republican. Three others did not show - Reps. William J. Jefferson of Louisiana, Collin C. Peterson of Minnesota and Mike Thompson of California.

"There were some in my party who probably would have preferred I wasn't here, but I think talking is worthwhile," Mr. Case said after the meeting, adding that he still agrees with AARP that the private accounts aren't the way to go.

Mr. Jefferson's office said he had never accepted the invitation, and Mr. Peterson's office didn't return a call. Mr. Thompson issued a letter saying he backed out because, although he is open to working with Republicans, he has "no interest in participating in sham meetings hyped as opportunities to promote bipartisanship but twisted, by some, into opportunities to promote themselves."

Rep. Jack Kingston of Georgia, one of six Republicans who attended the meeting, remarked: "At some point you have to decide whether you're going to represent Ms. Pelosi and she's going to own your soul, or whether you're going to represent your constituents."

Anti-Christian hate

"Harper's Magazine's May cover stories about 'The Christian Right's War On America' frightened me, although not the way Harper's meant them to," Stanley Kurtz writes at National Review Online (

"I fear these stories could mark the beginning of a systematic campaign of hatred directed at traditional Christians. Whether this is what Harper's intends, I cannot say. But regardless of the intention, the effect seems clear," Mr. Kurtz said.

"The phrase 'campaign of hatred' is a strong one, and I worry about amplifying an already dangerous dynamic of recrimination on both sides of the culture wars. I don't doubt that conservatives, Christian and otherwise, are sometimes guilty of rhetorical excess. Yet despite what we've been told, the most extreme political rhetoric of our day is being directed against traditional Christians by the left.

"It's been said that James Dobson overstepped legitimate bounds when he compared activist judges to the Ku Klux Klan. Yes, that was an ill-considered remark. I hope and expect it will not be repeated. But Dobson made that comparison extemporaneously and in passing. If that misstep was such a problem, what are we to make of a cover story in Harper's that systematically identifies conservative Christianity with fascism? According to Harper's, conservative Christians are making 'war on America.' Can you imagine the reaction to a cover story about a 'war on America' by blacks, gays, Hispanics, or Jews? Then there's Frank Rich's April 24 New York Times op-ed comparing conservative Christians to George Wallace, segregationists, and lynch mobs.

"These comparisons are both inflammatory and mistaken.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Pelosi Intervenes


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?