Staff Training and Ambulatory Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in South Africa

By Lewin, Simon; Dick, Judy et al. | Bulletin of the World Health Organization, April 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Staff Training and Ambulatory Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in South Africa


Lewin, Simon, Dick, Judy, Zwarenstein, Merrick, Lombard, Carl J., Bulletin of the World Health Organization


Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major contributor to the disease burden in developing countries (1-4), including South Africa (5), where it is exacerbated by the epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (6-8). The implementation of DOTS--the internationally recommended strategy for the control of TB (9, 10)--in South Africa since 1996 has improved drug availability, bacteriological diagnosis and programme monitoring. South Africa uses the 6-month (8 months for re-treatment patients) multi-drug regimen that includes rifampicin. Treatment is taken under the direct observation of another person such as a health-care provider or a lay volunteer (11). TB care in the public sector generally covers the poorest areas and is provided free of charge to patients (5). Nevertheless, cure rates in South Africa remain at 65% (5), and are therefore insufficient to control or reverse the epidemic.

Previous studies have suggested that the failure of the TB control programme in South Africa to achieve its treatment outcome targets is multifaceted (12-14) (Fig. 1). Poor quality of care, resulting from rigid clinic routines; poorly motivated staff; and inadequate provider-patient relations, all contribute to poor adherence to treatment (12, 15). Similar problems have been reported elsewhere (16-20). However, there is little rigorous evidence of the effects of interventions that aim to improve the way in which health workers care for TB patients (21, 22).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

To address these problems, a short in-service training programme for primary care clinic staff caring for TB patients was developed. We report here the findings of a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted to evaluate the impact of the programme on the outcomes of TB treatment (23).

The objective of the present study was to assess whether the addition to the DOTS strategy of an experiential, participatory training intervention for clinic staff would improve treatment outcomes, when compared to those achieved with DOTS alone, in TB patients attending clinics with low rates for the successful treatment of TB (< 70%) in South Africa.

Our study hypothesis was that training would have a positive impact on patient adherence and treatment outcomes through better provider-client relations and improvements in the organization of TB care. The approach was pragmatic: we tested an intervention that could be realistically implemented in public sector facilities in South Africa and in countries with similar health-care delivery systems, and that examined key outcomes of TB control programmes (24-26).

Methods

Setting

The study was undertaken in nurse-managed municipal primary health clinics that provided care to TB patients in Cape Town, South Africa. These clinics manage more than 90% of ambulatory TB treatment in the city. Many of the clinics are based in low-income, periurban townships. All had good access to diagnostic and referral facilities and drug supplies.

Ethics and consent

Study approval was granted by the Medical Research Council of South Africa and health department managers in Cape Town. The facilitators met the staff of each clinic allocated to the intervention group to discuss the programme and to seek their consent for participation. One clinic allocated to the intervention group refused the intervention, but was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Clinic recruitment

Primary care clinics had to meet the following entry criteria for participation in the trial.

* The overall successful treatment completion rate for all adult patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB was less than 70% in the year preceding the trial (1997). This ensured that only clinics with poor treatment outcomes were entered into the trial. Fifty-nine of the 90 municipal clinics were eligible under this criterion, accounting for 82% of the annual total load of adult, smear-positive pulmonary TB patients in Cape Town.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Staff Training and Ambulatory Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in South Africa
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?