The Year of Press Law Debates; Much Talk, Little Progress as Officials and Journalists in Eurasia and Eastern Europe Try to Define Press Freedom

By Sussman, Leonard R. | Editor & Publisher, January 2, 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Year of Press Law Debates; Much Talk, Little Progress as Officials and Journalists in Eurasia and Eastern Europe Try to Define Press Freedom


Sussman, Leonard R., Editor & Publisher


Much talk, little progress as officials and journalists in Eurasia and Eastern Europe try to define press freedom

IT WAS A year to debate press laws.

Officials and journalists in Eurasia and Eastern Europe spent much of 1992 defining press freedom, a stupendous task where the rule of law has not existed for generations.

Progress, of course, was slow. Overly defining freedom invited new restrictions. Nascent market economies, moreover, barely sustained competitive news media. Formal censorship ended, but many former communist journalists remained; others wrote polemics, not factual reports.

Worldwide, partial press freedom increased in many formerly authoritarian countries, though the percentage of free-press nations dropped slightly.

In the somewhat freer political climate, however, 82 journalists were murdered or killed on dangerous assignments, the most deaths recorded in one year.

Fifteen of 27 states in the former Soviet empire drafted laws to convert communist-style press monopolies into freer media operating in a market economy.

Independent, diversified journalism functions in only four of these countries, Czechoslovakia (before the split), Hungary, Mongolia, and Romania. Fifteen erstwhile Soviet-dominated states have partly free news media; in eight, press systems are not free.

Most accept in theory a diverse press mildly critical of government.. Yet press freedom in all 27 countries is increasingly threatened by national economies unable to sustain competitive media, and journalists tied to the new party or government.

The plight of mass media in the former Soviet empire was described in September by the deputy editor of Moscow News. He saw the end of newspapers. Readers, he said, will become solely television viewers because of inflated prices.

Yet, he concluded, "I do not doubt that, even with the total absence of the press, the Ministry of the Press will thrive, and the Parliament will produce resolutions of support and rights of mass media."

The debate over press laws would go on. Models for such debates were drawn from Moscow (1990) and Geneva (1992) with just a passing nod to Philadelphia (1791). In June 1990, the Supreme Soviet produced the U.S.S.R.'s first Law of the Press. The text covered 117 column-inches in Izvestia. That law guaranteed an uncensored, freer flow of information under communism's glasnost. Yet the extraordinary detail, such as intricate licensing procedures, opened new loopholes for bureaucrats to influence the media.

After the demise of the U.S.S.R., a far briefer, more liberal Russian press law went into effect last February. Monopolies in the media are forbidden, but the Communist Party's still-extensive holdings are not mentioned.

Since the Russian law omitted funding for censors, prior censorship is not only illegal but without structural support. Yet government bureaucrats still control newsprint allotments.

The American First Amendment, requiring complex checks and balances under judicial review, while observed abroad, was not a welcome import anywhere, even in Geneva at the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. That body tried throughout 1992 to redefine -- in effect, modify -- the unrestricted guarantee of press freedom in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In the end, the commission postponed action.

The commission seeks to separate certain news-media rights from which no exceptions can be taken, even in a state of emergency, from those media rights which can be annulled even if there is no emergency.

The commission's report cites an earlier stipulation (Article 19, para. 3, Universal Declaration) that the exercise of press freedom "carries with it special duties and responsibilities."

Critics of Western journalism have argued that some legal structure must assure the press's compliance. This, said the commission, involves "the veracity and accuracy of information and the responsible formulation of an opinion.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Year of Press Law Debates; Much Talk, Little Progress as Officials and Journalists in Eurasia and Eastern Europe Try to Define Press Freedom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?