Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Legislating Accountability: Standards, Sanctions, and School District Reform

By Saiger, Aaron J. | William and Mary Law Review, March 2005 | Go to article overview

Legislating Accountability: Standards, Sanctions, and School District Reform


Saiger, Aaron J., William and Mary Law Review


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
I. ACCOUNTABILITY, DETERRENCE, AND SIGNALING
   A. School District Nonaccountability and the
      Disestablishment Incentive
   B. District Responsiveness to Incentive Systems
   C. State Incentives and Capacity
   D. A Two-Player Model of Deterrence
II. OTHER ACTORS
   A. Courts
   B. Washington
CONCLUSION: WHITHER THE EDUCATIONAL POLITY?

INTRODUCTION

"Hold the public schools accountable!" This clarion cry, first heard in state capitals in the late 1980s, has since been repeated and amplified by many states, by the courts, and most recently, by the federal government. Only where school districts and schools are held to "account," the theory goes, ought one expect any program of school reform to be truly effective. Because unaccountable school districts lack incentives to succeed, waves of school reform have been able to wash over the nation's most troubled school districts for decades without substantially ameliorating their dismal and disgraceful performance. (1)

There can be no doubt that the programs grouped under the general rubric of the "New Accountability" mark an important shift in efforts to reform these troubled districts. (2) Accountability reforms operate in the public sphere, implicitly denying the claim that only markets can solve the problems of failing schools. They rely upon legislative and executive action, rather than locating the power to reform troubled schools in judges, who have limited control over schools' activities, no ongoing experience with education, and a constrained repertoire of remedies. And instead of regulating top-down, accountability reforms encourage flexibility at the local level where educational programs are implemented; they impose demands regarding outcomes and information sharing but leave local officials to find the best ways to reach the standards the programs impose.

This Article argues that accountability programs indeed offer a new and promising way to catalyze the reform of schools in crisis, but not by virtue of the features of the programs that have dominated public controversy. The most important innovation through which the New Accountability addresses the problems of distressed schools has to date been relegated to the sidelines. Public debate has focused on the wisdom and validity of testing students to measure their performance, the risks of regimenting education across a diversity of schools and modes of inquiry, the proper measurement of educational improvement, and the educational legitimacy of setting standards for schools in the first place. (3) The debate has come--implicitly in many cases and explicitly in some--largely to identify the New Accountability entirely with the practices of standard-setting, testing, and the dissemination of information about results. (4)

To make such an identification is to miss the reason that policymakers adopted a banner of "accountability" rather than simply one of "standards": American schools and school districts are peculiarly unaccountable institutions. They are insulated from the consequences of malfeasance by their natural monopoly over policy implementation, which ultimately must occur in classrooms widely dispersed and difficult to monitor; they are even more insulated by the peculiar intergovernmental structure of American education, which distributes responsibility for schools across two types of governments--states and school districts. (5) Although the state is the locus of constitutional authority over school policy, school districts enjoy virtually total power over policy implementation. This gives districts unusual freedom to pursue their own self-interest, which often diverges from the state's educational agenda. (6) District resistance to externally motivated policy change is the shoal upon which many previous education reform efforts have foundered. The fundamental task of accountability is to undermine district power to resist reform--not so much to define standards as to discover how to hold schools and school districts to whatever standards are established.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Legislating Accountability: Standards, Sanctions, and School District Reform
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.