Corporate Governance Audited: EBF's Spring 2001 Forum Sought to Answer the Question 'Is Corporate Governance Delivering Value?' Issues Covered Included the Independence and Structure of the Board, Transparency towards Stakeholders, and Different National Models of Governance. but What about the Key Role of Auditors?

By Nobel, Peter | European Business Forum, Summer 2001 | Go to article overview

Corporate Governance Audited: EBF's Spring 2001 Forum Sought to Answer the Question 'Is Corporate Governance Delivering Value?' Issues Covered Included the Independence and Structure of the Board, Transparency towards Stakeholders, and Different National Models of Governance. but What about the Key Role of Auditors?


Nobel, Peter, European Business Forum


The times are over when we dared to say: "In God's good governance we trust." In recent years, the notion of corporate governance and the issues surrounding it have been reflected in the development of corporate law and boardroom practice. No half-decent article or conference paper can omit some mention of this concept, though the issues and conclusions vary depending on the country discussed. Germany's governance with its dual supervisory and management boards is different from the English approach which in turn can be distinguished from the American one (albeit that both have a unitary board structure).

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

In international discussions, cultural differences are easily discernible. The US, for example, is driven by the agency problem: the continuous fear that managers will steal from shareholders, which leads to the conviction that managers must be monitored to ensure that they do not invest badly. (It is nonetheless always surprising to see how much managers take home in America, with all its monitoring techniques: the sums would be unthinkable in Europe.) The European approach tends to view the corporation much more as a social entity: it functions under the assumption that managers are guided, at least to some extent, by corporate interests.

The corporate governance debate

The corporate governance debate, as exemplified by the lively contributions in Issue 5 of EBF (Spring 2001), is good for Europe: it offers an avenue for both boards and management to get used to responding to the increasing demands of the capital markets. For a long time, shareholders were given almost no consideration. However, those bringing the capital--people, after all, who can always put that money to different use--are not only being given recognition but also are finding themselves well received in boardrooms. In this respect, corporate governance may be viewed as offering acquaintance with the growing equity culture and as enabling the creation of a truly European capital market.

So far EU legislative efforts to harmonise corporation law have not succeeded in accomplishing much: the most relevant proposal in this area (calling for a fifth 'Council Directive on the Structure of Public Limited Companies and the Powers and Obligations of their Organs' (1)) got stuck, inter alia, on the issue of employee participation. Yet another stab at harmonisation, the statute of a Societas Europaea (SE), was revived at the Nice Summit in December 2000 (2). This will lead to further developments but whether the OECD Corporate Governance Principles concerning the role of stakeholders can be read as a recognition of employee participation still remains to be seen. Among other things, these principles provide that "the corporate governance framework should permit performance-enhancing mechanisms for stakeholder participation." (3) Examples of these 'mechanisms', elaborated in the commentary to the principles, include "employee representation on boards; employee stock ownership plans or other profit sharing mechanisms or governance processes that consider stakeholder viewpoints in certain key decisions." (4)

The recent debate about corporate governance has led to the publication of a large number of international reports and principles written by distinguished committees. In addition to the already mentioned OECD principles, some of the more renowned of these are the Cadbury report of 1992, with the accompanying Code of Best Practices; the English Greenbury and Hampel reports of 1995 and 1998; the French Rapports Vienot I and II of 1995 and 1999; the 'Statement on Corporate Governance' of the American Business Roundtable of 1997; the Millstein report of 1998; the proposed Berlin Initiative Group German Code of Corporate Governance (5); the Corporate Governance Principles of the European Association of Securities Dealers (EASD) (6); and, finally, the paper of the German Grundsatzkommission for corporate governance of spring 2000. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corporate Governance Audited: EBF's Spring 2001 Forum Sought to Answer the Question 'Is Corporate Governance Delivering Value?' Issues Covered Included the Independence and Structure of the Board, Transparency towards Stakeholders, and Different National Models of Governance. but What about the Key Role of Auditors?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.