Corporate Social Responsibility through Government Action: EBF's Autumn 2000 Forum and Winter 2000 Forum Revisited Sections Highlighted the Growing Pressures on Business to Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible. but the Opportunity for Companies to Work in Partnership with Politicians in This Area Is in Danger of Being Overlooked

By Wilson, Andrew | European Business Forum, Summer 2001 | Go to article overview

Corporate Social Responsibility through Government Action: EBF's Autumn 2000 Forum and Winter 2000 Forum Revisited Sections Highlighted the Growing Pressures on Business to Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible. but the Opportunity for Companies to Work in Partnership with Politicians in This Area Is in Danger of Being Overlooked


Wilson, Andrew, European Business Forum


The role of business in society has never been so widely discussed. Much of the current debate centres on the notion that the authority of government has been diluted in the face of increasing corporate muscle.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The argument runs that politicians are powerless in the face of the pervasive influence of multinational companies. This view has found supporters in both the developed and the developing world. It seems that the extremist view of the anti-capitalist movement--that corporate power outstrips that of national governments--is gaining mainstream allies.

Recently, attacks on global capitalism have been rehearsed and re-evaluated in a number of best-selling books. In 1997, David Korten described how things would look in When Corporations Rule the World. Two years later he expounded on life after capitalism in The Post Corporate World. One year on and Naomi Klein gave a compelling account of the power of brands in No Logo. Most recently, Noreena Hertz joined this group to depict the level of corporate influence on the political system in her book, The Silent Takeover--Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy.

While all of these works are of great influence and merit, they all suffer from the problem of over-simplification. In trying to describe the pervasive influence of large companies they miss the other side of the argument. The fact remains that national governments--acting independently or in collaboration--retain a significant degree of monopolistic power over the activities of business. For example, in virtually all developed countries, government remains the largest employer. As such, government is able to influence the income and expenditure of a large proportion of GDP through its own activities. Beyond this, government has enormous power over business through legislation and taxation.

The debate about corporate social responsibility (CSR) that has been aired in previous editions of EBF has tended to polarise this argument about the relative status of business and government. On the one hand, we have heard Edward Kimman (Autumn 2000) argue for corporate political representation. In contrast, Viscount Etienne Davignon (Winter 2000) extolled the virtues of a voluntary corporate campaign to spread best practice in CSR across Europe.

What has so far been underplayed in the debate is the huge potential for business and government to work together to address some of the most pressing issues facing society. This is perhaps not surprising given the reluctance of national governments to articulate their expectations and requirements of business in delivering CSR initiatives.

This shortcoming was the subject of a recent study undertaken by Ashridge on behalf of The Copenhagen Centre (1). The report, 'Government as Partners' looked at the changing relationship between government and business in seven European countries. In particular, the research considered how and why national governments seek to work with business to promote social cohesion and combat social exclusion.

The starting point for understanding this emerging role of national governments is to appreciate the context in which they seek to deliver social welfare provision. Across Europe there has been a profound shift in the way in which public services are provided. The Keynesian notion of 'public goods' has largely been replaced by neo-liberal concepts of the free market.

Traditional ideas that government is in the best position to provide certain goods and services that benefit the whole of society have been modified to allow for the private provision of a variety of welfare services. Increasingly, business is called upon to enter into a wide range of partnerships with government--from large scale capital projects that involve public and private finance, through to the supply and delivery of welfare provision in healthcare, pensions, education and social housing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corporate Social Responsibility through Government Action: EBF's Autumn 2000 Forum and Winter 2000 Forum Revisited Sections Highlighted the Growing Pressures on Business to Be Socially and Environmentally Responsible. but the Opportunity for Companies to Work in Partnership with Politicians in This Area Is in Danger of Being Overlooked
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.