A Devil Disguised as a Corporate Angel? Questioning Corporate Charitable Contributions to "Independent" Directors' Organizations

By Ladd, Benjamin E. | William and Mary Law Review, April 2005 | Go to article overview

A Devil Disguised as a Corporate Angel? Questioning Corporate Charitable Contributions to "Independent" Directors' Organizations


Ladd, Benjamin E., William and Mary Law Review


A director's greatest virtue is the independence which allows him or her to challenge management decisions and evaluate corporate performance from a completely free and objective perspective. A director should not be beholden to management in any way. (1)

INTRODUCTION

Enron. (2) WorldCom. (3) Tyco. (4) The accounting scandals surrounding these former market giants (5) have precipitated a revolution in corporate governance (6) the likes of which the nation has never seen. (7) Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (8) ("Sarbanes-Oxley") less than two months after the WorldCom debacle. (9) Sarbanes-Oxley required the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to demand that self regulated organizations (SROs), like the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), promulgate new listing requirements focusing on corporate governance measures. (10)

At the heart of this new wave of reform is a call for more independence within boards of directors. (11) Sarbanes-Oxley requires there to be independent directors on all auditing committees. (12) The SROs have gone further and demand more of listed companies in terms of director independence. (13) Yet this is only the beginning. Institutional investors with significant market clout view Sarbanes-Oxley and the new SRO regulations as only a starting point. For example, one of the largest institutional investors in the country, CalPERS, (14) has an extensive manual specifically defining what kinds of directors they consider to be truly independent and outlining how such directors should function. (15)

Lurking beneath this global whirlwind (16) is an issue that has not gained much attention in recent scholarship: corporate charitable contributions. (17) As noted above, many governmental, regulatory, and institutional organizations have gone to great lengths to issue proposals to arrest the apparent decline of corporate governance standards. Few of them, however, have considered the likes of Ellen Futter. Ellen Futter is the president of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City and she "serves on four [corporate boards of directors]: insurer American International Group Inc., pharmaceutical maker Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., the energy company Consolidated Edison Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., the nation's second-biggest bank." (18) During Futter's tenure as President, the Museum of Natural History has received several large donations from the corporations on whose boards Ms. Futter sits. (19) Corporations such as these seek independence and credibility in the boardroom by employing accomplished and well-respected individuals, such as Ms. Futter, as directors. (20) The individuals, of course, have many reasons for serving as a director, but one cannot overlook the opportunity for those individuals to fundraise for their respective organizations through their special relationship with the corporation and its leaders.

In the past, there were relatively few instances where the courts (21) squarely confronted this ostensible conflict of interests. (22) Recently, however, the Delaware Chancery Court has dealt with the issue in two cases that gained significant attention from the media. Though corporate charitable contributions were not the primary issue in In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, the court did make a determination in that case that director Father Leo J. O'Donovan, the President of Georgetown University, was not influenced by Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Michael Eisner's charitable contributions to the university. (23) The court acknowledged that Eisner had made donations of over $1 million to the school since 1989, but it quickly dismissed the plaintiffs' allegation that the donations affected O'Donovan's independence as a director. (24) More recently, the court took a completely different stance in In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation. (25) In this lengthy opinion, the court thoroughly analyzed the independence of two members of a special litigation committee CSLC") charged with considering allegations against Oracle.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Devil Disguised as a Corporate Angel? Questioning Corporate Charitable Contributions to "Independent" Directors' Organizations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.