Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project Based Approach *

By Kucharski, Gregory A.; Rust, James O. et al. | Education, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project Based Approach *

Kucharski, Gregory A., Rust, James O., Ring, Tracey R., Education

Curriculum alternatives have been of interest to educators for years. For example, Kilpatrick (1918) contended that students should be actively involved and interested in their own education. One way to increase involvement is through projects. A project should be directed by the teacher in such a manner as to connect it to traditional subject areas (Stockton, 1920). Project-based curricula also should be thoroughly planned so that the curriculum provides a comprehensive education (Stevenson, 1921). It is important that the projects help students interpret knowledge, possibly by exposing them to background information prior to the beginning of a project (McMurry, 1921).

Katz and Chard (2000) agreed that a component of a project is to involve children actively seeking information in order to answer questions the children have formulated either alone, or in collaboration with a teacher. Project-based learning should be integrated with systematic instruction (Katz, 1994; Katz & Chard, 2000). Integration of systematic instruction with project-based learning gives children ample opportunity to acquire and apply knowledge and skills (Katz & Chard, 2000).

Advocates of the project approach to education suggest that project-based learning has the potential to build intrinsic motivation and provide opportunities to apply skills. Project-based learning can also increase self-esteem, enhance social skills and provide an environment for all children to experience success at some level (Katz, 1994; Wolk, 1994). Direct benefits of children working on projects include increased problem-solving ability as well as, research, communication, and resource-management skills (International Society for Technology in Education, 1997). Student autonomy and interaction in a project-based classroom can lead to increased usage of problem solving skills (Fry & Addington, 1984).

One of the key findings of testimonial research about the project approach is that children show a preference for this method of instruction (Liu & Chien, 1998; Wolk, 1994). Interviews with teachers have shown that they too prefer the project approach to traditional methods and observe improvements in motivation and enthusiasm among their students (Beneke, 2000; Liu & Chien, 1998). A study involving project learning in a high school showed an increase in interpreting and critically analyzing information based on subsequent interviews with the students (Peck, Peck, Sentz, & Zasa, 1998).

The current study evaluated the effectiveness of a project-based curriculum in a single elementary school. The Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) curriculum is a comprehensive project-based approach to instruction (Barnes, 1998). The EFG curriculum attempts to take advantage of the key components of project work that have been suggested by nearly a century of research on this method of teaching (Branom, 1919; Katz, 1994; Katz & Chard, 2000; Kilpatrick, 1918; McMurry, 1921; Stevenson, 1921; Stockton, 1920).

In the present study, the EFG curriculum was compared to the traditional curriculum currently used at the elementary school. This school followed the Tennessee curriculum model (Tennessee Department of Education). Teachers using the traditional curriculum also utilize project instruction at times but in a less structured and involved manner.

The EFG curriculum is structured in a manner to stress the same core skills and knowledge learned through a traditional curriculum. This structure allows for the utilization of standardized achievement tests to measure progress (Barnes, 1998). Although the outcomes of project-based learning may well exceed what is measured with standardized tests, the structured design of the EFG curriculum allows for a comparison with groups taught using a traditional curriculum. Therefore, this study compared the scores of Terra Nova standardized achievement tests (Fisher, 1996) for the students of the EFG curriculum with scores from the traditional method of instruction.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project Based Approach *


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?