Attitudes toward Physical Education and Class Preferences of Turkish Adolescents in Terms of School Gender Composition

By Koca, Canan; Asci, F. Hulya et al. | Adolescence, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Attitudes toward Physical Education and Class Preferences of Turkish Adolescents in Terms of School Gender Composition


Koca, Canan, Asci, F. Hulya, Demirhan, Giyasettin, Adolescence


Single-sex versus coeducation has developed into a long-standing debate which continues to flourish (Mael, 1998). From the early 1980s a large body of research in several Western countries such as Great Britain, Belgium, Canada, Australia, and the U.S. has accumulated on the advantages and disadvantages for boys and especially for girls (Arnot, 1983; Brutsaert & Houtte, 2004; Durrant, 1992; Dyer & Tiggeman, 1996; Granleese & Joseph, 1993; Lee & Marks, 1990; Mael, 1998; Mensinger, 2001; Shmurak, 1998).

The debate commonly centered around the need for equal education opportunities for girls and boys by focusing on different aspects of schooling. Of all the curriculum areas of contemporary schooling, Physical Education (PE) provides the optimum opportunity for focus on gender inequities. Scraton (1990) has described school PE as overtly reinforcing gender differences in terms of the activities offered, and covertly through the attitudes and reactions of those involved in the policy and practice of PE. On the other hand, the social construction of the body in PE and sport that is focused on issues of slenderness, muscularity, and physicality, has been of central importance to the construction of femininity and masculinity (Connell, 1983; Hall, 1996). Therefore, keeping in mind the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of single-sex and coeducational schools for gender equity, it seems important to examine students' attitudes toward PE and PE class preferences in these two different types of school.

Attitudes toward PE

In recent years, there has been an increase in the body of knowledge in PE in terms of student attitudes. The increase in interest may also be attributed to the influence of attitudes toward future participation in physical activities outside school (Carlson, 1995; Ennis, 1996; Portman, 1995), to student achievement in PE (Graham, 1995; Lee, 1997; Silverman, 1993; Subramaniam & Silverman, 2000), and to the availability of knowledge gained about students' attitudes toward PE for developing curricula (Cothran & Ennis, 1998).

Since gender plays an important mediating role in attitudes toward PE, many studies have compared girls' and boys' attitudes. In these studies, boys were found to display more positive attitudes toward physical activities that were challenging and had an element of risk (Folsom-Meek, 1992; Smoll & Schutz, 1980), whereas girls showed more favorable attitudes toward physical activities emphasizing aesthetics (Birtwistle & Brodie, 1991; Folsom-Meek, 1992; Hicks, Wiggins, Crist, & Moode, 2001; Smoll & Schutz, 1980).

PE Class Preferences: Single-sex or Coed?

If we consider students as being capable of understanding the significance of the gender composition of the classroom on their learning, then preferences for single-sex or coed PE may help us to understand their experiences in different classroom settings. In this regard, recent qualitative studies (Olafson, 2002; Osborne, Bauer, & Sutliff, 2002) have examined students' PE class preferences. Osborne and his colleagues (2002) reported that although the choice of single-sex or coed PE is largely based on curriculum objectives, students favor single-sex PE.

A study by Treanor, Graber, Housner, and Wiegand (1998) examined participation in a year-long multi-activity PE program in which classes were coeducational in the fall semester and single-sex in the spring semester. The findings indicated that middle school students showed preferences for single-sex PE regardless of perceived level of skill, fitness, or effort. Both boys and girls perceived that they performed skills and played team sports better, received more practice opportunities, and were less fearful of injury in single-sex PE. Similarly, Lirgg's (1993) 10-week basketball study reported that both male and female middle school students preferred single-sex PE.

Over the past few decades, the education system in Turkey, as in some Western countries, has become progressively coeducational.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Attitudes toward Physical Education and Class Preferences of Turkish Adolescents in Terms of School Gender Composition
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?