Bad Medicine: How the Media Helped the Medical Establishment Cast Doubt on Innovative Approaches to Fighting AIDS

By Kwitny, Jonathan | Washington Journalism Review, January-February 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Bad Medicine: How the Media Helped the Medical Establishment Cast Doubt on Innovative Approaches to Fighting AIDS

Kwitny, Jonathan, Washington Journalism Review

In his new book, "Acceptable Risks," Jonathan Kwitny chronicles the story of two men, Martin Delaney and Jim Corti, who sacrificed their careers to help find life-extending drugs for AIDS patients. In the process, they waged a citizens' revolt against the establishment medical community, large drug companies and the Food and Drug Administration. Kwitny set out to tell a saga of two unlikely heroes, but in the course of doing research for the book came across numerous examples of inaccurate reporting that harmed their reputations and often undermined their efforts.

When Martin Delaney and Jim Corti began smuggling drugs across the U.S.-Mexican border in the mid-1980s, their efforts were considered by many to be a labor of love. They weren't bringing in heroin or cocaine. Instead, they were smuggling promising anti-AIDS drugs, sold over the counter in Mexico but not available in the United States. Neither Delaney nor Corti, who are both gay, was infected by the AIDS virus. Yet they were surrounded by sick friends hoping for anything that might extend their lives-medicines they weren't getting from their doctors or the government, which approves AIDS drugs.

It was the beginning of a decade-long crusade that would challenge and change the medical establishment's and Food and Drug Administration's way of doing business. The two men's efforts quickly expanded beyond buying and selling drugs. They organized doctors and patients in an underground network to test the safety and efficacy of potentially useful drugs years before FDA-supervised research would have. Standard drug approval procedures typically consume a decade and hundreds of millions of dollars.

Delaney, Corti and others involved with the tests proved that research could be done much faster and cheaper than in the official process, and that many drugs could be offered safely to patients much earlier. They also built a case for a testing system that, while less precise than the FDA:S, was still scientifically adequate for many purposes. Many more lives would be saved by speedier access to drugs, they argued, than would be lost by overly hasty access, especially in cases involving deadly diseases such as AIDS. Delaney has since been applauded for his efforts by those benefiting from the drugs and leading government scientists, including some at the FDA. Corti continues to work underground investigating new drugs manufactured in other countries.

But in the early days, Delaney, a successful bank consultant living near San Francisco, and Corti, an artist working as a nurse in Los Angeles, were treated as outlaws by the federal government. They were vilified by research doctors who, though dedicated to scientific service, had grown accustomed to and made their livings from the drug testing system that Delaney and Corti were threatening.

Unfortunately, their efforts were also undermined by the press. Print and broadcast reporters were all too eager to accept the views of the FDA and research doctors with a financial stake in drug testing. These scientists, who often work at university teaching hospitals, rely on research grants provided by drug companies and federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health.

While the media had every reason to be skeptical of Delaney's and Corti's methods, they also had reason to be skeptical of the FDA. By accepting without question statements made by the FDA and establishment scientists, the media, inadvertently or not, became a mouthpiece for the FDA and the drug industry. Inaccurate coverage damaged the reputations of Delaney, Corti and their supporters in the medical profession. Worse, it contributed to delays in testing and approval that ultimately caused more suffering for the patients Delaney and Corti were trying to help.

"What [Delaney] was trying to do was establish a principle that things needed to be studied quickly and scientifically, [while providing] access on a wide scale to people in need," says Samuel Broder, director of the National Cancer Institute.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Bad Medicine: How the Media Helped the Medical Establishment Cast Doubt on Innovative Approaches to Fighting AIDS


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?