Restoration or Renovation? Evaluating Restorative Justice Outcomes

By Beven, Jaimie P.; Hall, Guy et al. | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, April 2005 | Go to article overview

Restoration or Renovation? Evaluating Restorative Justice Outcomes


Beven, Jaimie P., Hall, Guy, Froyland, Irene, Steels, Brian, Goulding, Dorothy, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


Critics of restorative justice claim that its popularity is based on 'humanistic sentiment' and suggest that the process is incapable of achieving its aim of restoring victims and offenders. The current study sought to establish if restorative justice is capable of restoring victims and offenders in a meaningful manner, or if the process simply results in a superficial renovation of the impact of crime. Seventy-two victims and offenders participated in a community group conference model of restorative justice and were compared on outcome variables with a control group of victims and offenders who underwent a conventional court process. Results demonstrate that the process is capable of impacting upon variables associated with the criminal act. Furthermore, it is argued that a reduction in offending behaviour and victimisation impact are realistic outcomes of the restorative justice processes, Finally, regression analysis indicated that victims were satisfied with the restorative justice process asa result of their greater participation rather than their satisfaction with reparation or restitution.

**********

Restorative justice theories represent a departure from the current criminal justice system; however, the principles and methods involved are by no means novel. Mediation as a means of dealing with wrongdoing predates the Germanic model of the King's Peace, which effectively changed personal injury into a public wrong (Young, 2001). Although some apparently view this shift in a less than positive light (e.g., Delgado's [2000] use of the term atavistic), Cohen (2001, p. 209) argues that restorative justice's appeal is a direct result of '... deep dissatisfaction with the traditional criminal justice system ...'. Indeed, restorative justice models appear capable of addressing the three main deficits of the current criminal justice system. That is, firstly the current system is state-oriented and sees crime as a violation against the state, secondly the current system is punishment and offender-oriented and neglects victims, and finally the current system neglects the need for offenders' reintegration into society (Dzur & Olson, 2004). Addressing these concerns is made possible by three overarching principles of restorative justice. First, restorative justice models view crime as a conflict between the individuals involved and results in harm to victims and communities rather than the state. Second, the central goal of restorative justice is to reconcile and repair that harm, and finally, the process facilitates active participation by all parties involved (Latimer & Kleinknecht, 2000). Although the arguments underpinning the momentum behind the restorative justice movement seem sensible, advocates are not devoid of resistance.

Critics of restorative justice models express concern that they may be doing more harm than good and that their appeal lies in 'humanistic sentiment' rather than being based on objective empirical support (Levrant, Cullen, Fulton, & Wozniak, 1999). Delgrado (2000, p. 759) contends that restorative justice models deliver a 'disservice to victims, offenders and society at large'. Indeed, a major criticism of restorative justice is that it fails to deliver what it claims; in that restorative justice does not restore victims and offenders. However, Morris (2002, p. 597) asserts that many of the criticisms aimed at restorative justice are a result of a 'fundamental misunderstanding of what restorative justice seeks to achieve'. Certainly we would be doing restorative justice a disservice were we to 'raise expectations of complete success' (Wright, 2002). It would be unrealistic to expect restorative justice to restore victims and offenders to their pre-offence condition. One cannot undo the crime, but proponents of restorative justice do not make this claim. Rather, there are specific goals associated with restorative justice that make empirical evaluation of the process outcomes possible. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Restoration or Renovation? Evaluating Restorative Justice Outcomes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.