Assessing Efforts to Mitigate the Impacts of Drainage on Wetlands in Ontario, Canada

By Walters, Dan; Shrubsole, Dan | The Canadian Geographer, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Assessing Efforts to Mitigate the Impacts of Drainage on Wetlands in Ontario, Canada


Walters, Dan, Shrubsole, Dan, The Canadian Geographer


Introduction

Land drainage is an essential component of agricultural activity throughout the world. The intent is to increase the production and/or productivity of the land. However, many drainage schemes in Ontario (Snell 1987) and elsewhere (Davis and Froend 1999; La Peyre et al. 2001) have often contributed to the loss of wetland areas. The installation and maintenance of open ditch or closed outlet drainage systems contribute to the alteration of natural environments (Krapu 1996). While the approval of an individual drainage work may appear insignificant, the cumulative impact of these decisions results in significant losses of function, value and wetland area (Hill 1976; Spaling 1995). The interaction of physical, biological and chemical components of a wetland provides a number of functions that include flood protection, erosion control, groundwater recharge and discharge and water purification through the retention of nutrients, sediments and pollutants (Whiteley 1979). The values that wetlands provide to society include maintenance of water quality and quantity, recreation and tourism opportunities and wildlife resources. However, historical studies have demonstrated that despite the natural functions and values of wetlands, southern Ontario has experienced a loss of wetland areas at the expense of improving agricultural land (Snell 1987). To protect against the continued loss of wetland area in Ontario, a referral process has been developed to regulate outlet drainage activities that are pursued under the Drainage Act R.S.O. (1990, c. D. 17).

Responsibility for regulating drainage resides at the provincial level in Canada. Provinces have the statutory control of private property and civil rights, as well as control over natural resources and public lands. The management of wetlands regularly deals with a conflict over private property rights and public rights. The indirect protection of wetlands through various Ontario statutes is one means through which government agencies guide development on private property (Dahme 1988). However, when dealing with wetlands, further protection is extended to wildlife and the maintenance of the ecological integrity of an area. Therefore, lawmakers and government officials have to balance the rights of individual property owners with the interests of the public and other species.

In Ontario, the Drainage Act outlines a referral system for agencies to protect wetland resources against the impacts of municipal outlet drainage. The purpose of this article was to assess the outcome of the mitigation measures recommended for municipal outlet drainage schemes and the impacts on wetland area at the landscape scale. Drainage has been a long-established practice in Zorra Township for over 125 years (Wicklund and Richards 1961). A review of Zorra Township's drainage applications for the period 1978-1997 provides insights into Ontario's municipal outlet decision-making process, the nature of recommended mitigation measures and resulting impacts on wetland area (Figure 1).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Agricultural drainage research

The conflict between agricultural production and wet]and management is a long-standing research theme (Kettel and Day 1974; Whiteley 1979; Bowers 1983; Turner et al. 1983; Williams and Browne 1987; Morris 1989; Mitchell and Shrubsole 1994). This section provides a brief overview of previous research related to wetland protection and agricultural drainage.

The economic value of drainage works or benefit-cost analysis has often been calculated to determine the utility of drainage projects. In England, both Bowers (1983) and Turner et al. (1983) examined the utility of drainage projects. They concluded that the benefit-cost appraisals that supported drainage projects generally overestimated benefits (Bowers 1983) and that agricultural drainage of wetlands could not be supported on economic grounds (Turner et al.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Assessing Efforts to Mitigate the Impacts of Drainage on Wetlands in Ontario, Canada
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?