The Emancipation Proclamation and British Public Opinion

By Ewan, Christopher | The Historian, Spring 2005 | Go to article overview

The Emancipation Proclamation and British Public Opinion


Ewan, Christopher, The Historian


The protectionists say they do not seek to put down slavery. The slaveholders say they want free trade. Need you wonder at the confusion in John Bull's poor head? He gives up! Leaves it to the Government. (1)

John Bright

UNTIL THE 1960S, students and scholars thought of the historiography of British public opinion during the Civil War in clear-cut terms: the landed aristocracy and Conservatives were pro-Confederacy, while the working classes and Liberals were pro-Union. However, as John Bright's letter to Charles Sumner suggests, British opinion during this time was in fact ambiguous and divided on the "American question." Far from simply supporting one side or the other, the British wrestled with the economic, moral, and political implications of the War Between the States, often changing their opinion of the belligerents as the war progressed. Ultimately the British government remained neutral in the conflict, thereby providing de facto support for the Union government, despite early pleas from within Britain and from France for mediation and support of the Confederacy. What was it, then, that prevented the British from intervening on behalf of the Confederacy?

The issue of slavery and the extent of its role in causing the fracture between the North and South at the onset of the war was ambiguous to most of the British public, whose country had ended slavery in her colonies in 1834. Even vaguer and more frustrating to the British was the North's inchoate stance on slavery; for while a very small minority of abolitionists from the North were loudly pushing the war as a crusade against slavery, its president claimed to have "no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists." (2) Indeed, the Federal government's position on slavery would remain unclear until the fall of 1862, when President Lincoln, freed from concern over the possible secession of the four slave-owning Border States, issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which would go into effect 1 January 1863. From this point forth, the abolition of slavery in the states in rebellion was to be a war aim of the Union.

The Emancipation Proclamation was a pronouncement to the British--indeed, to the world--that the North was fighting against the institution of slavery. It guaranteed that any government considering intervention or mediation on behalf of the South would no doubt face intense public pressure from within their own countries against aiding a pro-slavery nation, and it was this, more than anything else, that prevented the British from intervening in or mediating the conflict across the Atlantic. Despite questions over the real motives of Lincoln's issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation and the initial negative reaction to it and its potential for causing racial strife in the U.S. South, the British in time came to accept and support the North's abolitionist aims as legitimate and in good faith. The story of how British opinion of the belligerents oscillated throughout the war, until ultimately siding with the North because of its abolitionist stance, is a tale worth telling.

By 1860, the United States and Great Britain shared many political, economic, and ethnic bonds that were forged as far back as the 1600s, when the fledgling American colonies were under the wing and direction of the British Empire. Despite the fact that the American colonies fought to move out of the British household during the American Revolution, these two countries remained cousins, linked by a strong tradition of respect for democratic institutions and sharing rapidly expanding and industrializing economies. Of particular importance and consequence to the U.S. Civil War was the dependence of British manufacturers on U.S. cotton to feed their textile mills. By 1860, Britain imported almost 1.4 billion pounds of cotton annually; of this, U.S. cotton accounted for 1.12 billion pounds, or over 80 percent of the supply. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Emancipation Proclamation and British Public Opinion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.