Refining Valuation Models: Property-Valuation Models Have a Ways to Go before Their Full Contribution to the Lending Process Can Be Realized. Much Is Still Not Well-Understood about How They Work
Nattagh, Nima, Ross, Dave, Mortgage Banking
SINCE THEIR COMMERCIAL INTRODUCTION IN THE EARLY 1990S, RESIDENTIAL property-valuation models have significantly altered collateral-valuation methods in mortgage origination and underwriting. However, as early participants in the development and deployment of valuation models, we see profound weaknesses in the approaches taken by lenders, vendors and regulators to understand and apply this new technology. This is particularly true in the areas of testing and implementation. [??] In our view, the conventional process by which automated valuation model (AVM) products are evaluated and compared is fundamentally flawed. Much emphasis is placed on the esoteric aspects of property-valuation modeling and third-decimal-point precision in comparing model performance, yet underlying testing methodologies produce results that are neither representative nor predictive of future performance. [??] Also, the application of property-valuation models to collateral-assessment processes has been disappointingly rudimentary, in our view. In a sense, the industry has struggled to replace a complex, multistage appraisal process with a single mathematical calculation--with predictably disappointing results. [??] At the root of the industry's struggle with property-valuation models is a lack of understanding of probability theory and a concomitant desire to seek validation of the accuracy of every individual estimate. If we applied that same philosophy to rating the likelihood that a given airline flight might not reach its destination, attendance at the upcoming Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) Annual Conference would be disappointingly sparse.
Although estimates vary, by some accounts as much as 50 percent of originations may involve the use of valuation models as an instrument of loan underwriting. Much of this use is concentrated in the refinance and home-equity lending sector, with purchase-mortgage lending generally relying upon conventional appraisal practices.
Despite property-valuation models' increased adoption and in spite of ongoing opposition from the more traditional elements of the appraiser community, lenders still face major challenges in convincing investors and regulators of the value of valuation models.
While many stakeholders have expressed concern about the performance and validity of property-valuation models, it remains to be seen whether these concerns are valid. We argue in this article that if the technology is to be advanced, the focus should be directed at how property-valuation models are ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Refining Valuation Models: Property-Valuation Models Have a Ways to Go before Their Full Contribution to the Lending Process Can Be Realized. Much Is Still Not Well-Understood about How They Work.
Contributors: Nattagh, Nima - Author, Ross, Dave - Author.
Magazine title: Mortgage Banking.
Volume: 65.
Issue: 11
Publication date: August 2005.
Page number: 70+.
© 2009 Mortgage Bankers Association of America.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset