Top Court to Hear Two Big Cases for Industry: Arbitration Clauses, Jurisdictional Issues on the Fall Docket

By Zindler, Ethan | American Banker, September 2, 2005 | Go to article overview

Top Court to Hear Two Big Cases for Industry: Arbitration Clauses, Jurisdictional Issues on the Fall Docket


Zindler, Ethan, American Banker


WASHINGTON -- Two cases the Supreme Court is slated to hear this fall could have a significant effect on the financial services industry.

The first would determine whether national banks can be sued in a state court anywhere they have a branch. The second could nullify some arbitration clauses frequently used by banks and credit card companies.

Whether a national bank can be sued in a state or federal court is a critical question. Bankers fear that state courts favor local plaintiffs and are not friendly to large, national organizations.

"Oftentimes you get a fairer shake in federal court than local courts," because plaintiffs have a "hometown advantage" in state court, said Gil Schwartz, a lawyer with Schwartz & Ballen LLP. Also, "you have greater consistency in federal court, because there are fewer courts."

The case stems from a suit related to KPMG LLP's sale of illegal tax shelters. The auditing giant reached a settlement with the Justice Department last week, and the high court is not expected to weigh in on the shelters' legality. Instead, it is expected to decide where, in the eyes of the law, a national bank is located.

Daniel G. Schmidt 3d, a South Carolina resident, filed a lawsuit in April 2003 in state court accusing Wachovia Corp.'s staff of talking him into using one of the tax shelters. The Internal Revenue Service later audited him.

Shortly after the suit was filed, it was remanded to a federal court, because Wachovia argued the case involved parties in multiple states. But Mr. Schmidt argued that the suit should be heard in state court, since both he and the Wachovia personnel he dealt with were in South Carolina.

Judge Michael Luttig of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit agreed and said the case revolved around an interpretation of the word "located" in a section of the federal code pertaining to national banks.

"In ordinary parlance, the word 'located' is a general term referring to physical presence in a place," and since the Wachovia branch was in South Carolina, the case should be heard there, Judge Luttig wrote.

Wachovia said the ruling contradicted three prior circuit court decisions and appealed to the Supreme Court, which is scheduled to hear oral arguments Nov. 28.

If Wachovia loses, industry representatives are concerned more lawsuits would be decided in state courts. They also worry that such a decision could put national banks at a disadvantage to state banks.

Since Judge Luttig cited a section of the federal code pertaining only to national banks, a Supreme Court ruling against Wachovia could let state banks with branches in multiple states continue to remand cases to federal court, while national banks could not.

The American Bankers Association raised just such a possibility in its brief supporting Wachovia.

"National banks' opportunities for access to federal courts will effectively be destroyed in the majority of cases because, unlike their state-chartered counterparts, they are deemed to be citizens of every state in which they have a branch," the ABA argued in the brief. "Instead of maintaining parity between national banks and state banks -- or other corporate entities, for that matter -- the lower court's decision singles out national banks for disparate treatment."

A day after hearing that case, the Supreme Court is scheduled to take up one that stemmed from a dispute between a payday lender and one of its customers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Top Court to Hear Two Big Cases for Industry: Arbitration Clauses, Jurisdictional Issues on the Fall Docket
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.