Guiding Lights: Intelligence Oversight and Control for the Challenge of Terrorism

By Berman, Jerry; Flint, Lara | Criminal Justice Ethics, Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

Guiding Lights: Intelligence Oversight and Control for the Challenge of Terrorism


Berman, Jerry, Flint, Lara, Criminal Justice Ethics


Winning the war on terrorism requires clear guidelines for data collection, use, and dissemination. The failure of our law enforcement and intelligence agencies to predict and prevent the attacks of September 11, 2001, was powerful evidence of the need for reform of U.S. counterterrorism efforts. Unfortunately, in the government's reaction to September 11 central elements of developing policy have been both dangerous to civil liberties and unlikely to improve national security. In particular, the tendency by legislators and executive branch officials to loosen limits on domestic spying and to weaken oversight mechanisms fundamentally undermines the efficacy of Constitutional checks and balances. The hijackers did not evade detection because of rules intended to guide the efforts of intelligence and law enforcement agencies and to prevent the chilling of activities protected by the First Amendment, although some of these rules have been misunderstood and misapplied in perverse ways. As we seek to improve intelligence collection, sharing, and analysis, it is necessary to set reasonable guidelines for the FBI, the CIA, and the new Department of Homeland Security and to enforce them though judicial and Congressional oversight. Such guidelines are as important to the prevention of terrorism as they are to the protection of civil liberties.

One response to September 11 has been the loosening of rules on information collection through electronic and other means. But casting a wider net and collecting massive volumes of information without direction is not justified by what we know about government activity before September 11. The joint investigation into September 11 by the Congressional intelligence committees identified no pre-9/11/01 legal barriers that needed to be lifted for the government to collect the information necessary to prevent terrorism. Nor did an independent task force commissioned by the Markle Foundation identify such a need. (1) Instead, a primary lesson drawn by Congressional and other inquiries into the September 11 intelligence failure is that the government did not make good use of the information it had already collected and failed to utilize information-sharing authorities at its disposal. Granting the government broader authority to collect vastly greater volumes of information without particularized suspicion could exacerbate this problem. Collecting more information will not catch terrorists if the information is irrelevant because it has been acquired without deliberate targeting.

The war on terrorism will be aided, not hampered, by respect for core Constitutional values: the First Amendment rights to assembly, speech, and the exercise of religion; due process, especially the right to confront the charges and accusers against oneself in a court open to public scrutiny; and privacy. By "privacy," we mean fair information principles that not only protect personal dignity, but also ensure the accuracy of information as the government collects and draws inferences from the ocean of data produced by the digital revolution.

The Relationship Between Law Enforcement and Intelligence

Our nation has traditionally drawn distinctions between law enforcement and foreign intelligence, and between agencies operating domestically and those focused overseas. Sometimes these distinctions have been seen as creating a "wall" that has prevented the useful sharing of information and other forms of collaboration among various agencies. One theme of the Patriot Act--officially entitled the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act--was to break down the "wall" between law enforcement and intelligence.

In fact, there was never just one wall. As the Congressional inquiry into September 11 found, there were really many walls, built between and within agencies over the past sixty years as a result of various legal, policy, institutional, and individual factors. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Guiding Lights: Intelligence Oversight and Control for the Challenge of Terrorism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.