Quality of Care in the Social Services: Research Agenda and Methods

By McMillen, J. Curtis; Proctor, Enola K. et al. | Social Work Research, September 2005 | Go to article overview

Quality of Care in the Social Services: Research Agenda and Methods


McMillen, J. Curtis, Proctor, Enola K., Megivern, Deborah, Striley, Catherine Woodstock, Cabassa, Leopoldo J., Munson, Michelle R., Dickey, Barbara, Social Work Research


In an era of heightened accountability, remarkably little is known empirically about the quality of social work services. This article applies insights from health services research to propose a research agenda on the quality of care in the social services. The agenda calls for studies that address the definition of quality service, variations in quality, the relationship between quality service and outcomes, structural influences on quality, and ways to improve quality. The article also details specialized research methods for implementing this agenda, including the use of administrative data, risk-adjusted outcomes, case vignettes, standardized consumers, and stakeholder preference assessments. Although social work is currently underrepresented in quality research, social workers' research skills, their traditional academic-agency partnerships, and their accent on consumer experiences position the profession to make quick strides in developing the information needed for quality improvement efforts.

KEY WORDS: quality of care; research agenda; research methods; social services

**********

Assessing and improving quality of care may become this decade s most pressing social work research and practice concern. In nearly every social service sector, stakeholders and contractors expect agencies to monitor and improve quality. Clyman (1999) characterized the shift toward increased accountability in the human services as perhaps "the largest scale social experimentation since the New Deal" (p. 167). Despite the urgent need, social work has yet to engage in the full variety of research endeavors that can inform efforts to improve the quality of social services. This article presents a quality-of-care research agenda for the profession and introduces the field to several specialized research methods that can help implement this agenda.

BUILDING THE CASE FOR QUALITY OF CARE RESEARCH

Quality is not a new concern for social work. At numerous times in our history, the profession placed quality concerns at the top of its agenda. Evidence for this is found in social work's historical emphasis on supervision and lifelong learning, the designation of competence as a core value in NASW's Code of Ethics, development and publication of standards and best practices (for example, Child Welfare League of America, 2000; NASW, 2002), performance assessment requirements (Harry, 1997), and management frameworks such as total quality management (TQM) (Boettcher, 1998).

Despite these emphases, remarkably little is known empirically about the quality of our nation's social services. TQM, as applied, has largely dropped the heavy accent on data collection that was core to its original conceptualization (Hackman & Wageman, 1995). Past social work research efforts aimed at quality improvement have typically focused on outcome evaluations (for example, Hughes, 1999). But knowing what works is only one part of the data needed to create social services agencies that work well. Proctor (2002) noted the dearth of social services research on quality and encouraged the development and application of research methods to quality concerns.

Meanwhile, quality has emerged as the most pressing policy concern in health care (Institute of Medicine, 2001), and a field of research has developed to address quality concerns in the medical services. As part of these efforts, several scholars have attempted to list the main questions that health care quality-of-care researchers address in an attempt to draw boundaries around the field (for example, Brook, McGlynn, & Clearly, 1996; Dickey, Hermann, & Eisen, 1998; Dickey & Sederer, 2001). We used these questions from health services research as a point of departure for building a quality of care research agenda for the social services. These questions rely to some degree on the landmark conceptualization of quality offered by Donabedian (1982), who argued that the structure of a service system affects its service processes and that its service processes affect consumer outcomes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Quality of Care in the Social Services: Research Agenda and Methods
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.