Multimedia Software Evaluation Form for Teachers

By Herring, Donna F.; Notar, Charles E. et al. | Education, Fall 2005 | Go to article overview

Multimedia Software Evaluation Form for Teachers


Herring, Donna F., Notar, Charles E., Wilson, Janell D., Education


Software Evaluation Form for Teachers

The Project

Schools are currently receiving increased funds for multimedia software for classrooms. There is a need for good software in the schools, and there is a need to know how to evaluate software and not naively rely on advertisements. Evaluators of multimedia software for education must have the skills to critically evaluate and make decisions not only about format, but also content and the process of learning. The evaluation form developed in this paper is a simple and practical product that presents a balanced set of guidelines for evaluating and selecting educational multimedia software.

Several national organizations (e.g. ISTE) and states (e.g. Alabama) have announced their technology standards for teacher certification, teachers, administrators and students in the past two years. These two events show the importance of using quality software evaluation forms for teaching and developing student evaluation skills and to know "what to look for." As more schools use multimedia software, teachers are increasingly having their students use the programs for a variety of learning activities. Many teachers are finding multimedia software to be a valuable teaching tool that offers a bonanza of learning activities for students. Teachers must give students materials that are not offensive, outdated, or biased. Teachers need to provide objective data regarding the instructional effectiveness of the multimedia software before purchase.

The purpose of this project is to develop a multimedia software evaluation form that engages pre-service teachers in the selection of materials for development of instructional activities that can be used in multidisciplinary environments. The form is diagnostic and prescriptive.

The authors looked at the current software evaluation tool being used at the authors' university and determined it needed to be upgraded to meet the new advances in computer software. Pre-service teachers need to gain knowledge of the components of good software (e.g. content, ease of use, design, etc.). A review of "what's out there" was conducted to see if there was a current evaluation form that could be adopted and to see what the research said should be in an evaluation form. Most of the evaluation forms concentrated on the technology and mechanics and did not look at pedagogy and content. It was also noted that there is no standard evaluation criteria or common terminology. The authors decided to develop an evaluation form with the purpose of the project to provide an evaluation and selection instrument of multimedia software that met the requirements of some balance between mechanics, content and pedagogy that is user friendly.

The Pilot

This project consisted of the development of an evaluation form for multimedia software programs for teaching pre-service teachers how to evaluate multimedia software programs for their classes, schools, students, and individual use. However, the form can be used by in-service teachers and anyone else with knowledge of multimedia software. Students were given an assignment to use the form to evaluate three instructor provided multimedia software programs. Students will learn to use the form to evaluate different types of software components (e.g., tutorial, drill & practice, simulation, instructional games, branching, problem solving, etc.).

The initial trial of the evaluation form was done using students who were taking their introduction to technology class on line (Group 1) and students who were taking the class in-resident (Group 2). Students in the Group 1 were asked without instruction on the form to evaluate three software packages. Students in the Group 2 were asked to evaluate three software packages but were given instruction on the evaluation form. There were 25 software packages that the students could evaluate. The expert score was arrived at averaging three technology professors' scores. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Multimedia Software Evaluation Form for Teachers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.