Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Fiduciary Responsibility

By Keenan, James F. | Theological Studies, March 1993 | Go to article overview

Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Fiduciary Responsibility


Keenan, James F., Theological Studies


Questions concerning the release of information have recently been raised in several areas, such as the Gulf war, the physical- and mental-health histories of public persons, the identification of rape victims, and the threat of AIDS. Ensuing discussions have been guided by an important insight: the responsibilities entrusted to particular professions contribute to the determination of whether release of information is considered right and proper. These responsibilities distinguish two kinds of professions. On the one hand, the news media, which serve the common good by enabling society access to information that belongs within the public domain. On the other hand, professions that care for the mental, physical, or spiritual well-being of individual persons, and which are obliged to protect the specific histories of those whom they serve. Generally speaking, the news media are obliged to report or disclose; therapists, physicians, and ministers are obliged to maintain confidentiality. These four professions will be considered in this note.(1)

Almost all the relevant controversies raised in 1992 concern whether these general obligations ought to admit any exceptions. These controversies offer us a rich opportunity: they invite us to face not only the thorny issues about information, but also the relationship of some particular professions to ethics. In addressing this relationship, the recent return of virtue ethics becomes helpful.(2) Three particular virtues emerge: prudence, which enables journalists and physicians to make right decisions;(3) which grounds the priority of all confidences; and justice, which protects the common good. These three virtues guide us in determining when exceptions must be made to the general obligations.

The News Media

Generally speaking, the news media's ethical debates for 1992 concerned whether journalists ought always to disclose. The debates dealt with three major areas of concern: security leaks, the private lives of public persons, and the naming of rape victims. But their central concern, disclosure, is itself bracketed by two other issues. First, prior to disclosure is the journalist's task to obtain information. In light of the Gulf war journalism's most important ethical question this year concerned not the release of information, but the antecedent obligation of getting privileged access to information. Censorship of war coverage concerned not what journalists could release, but what they could know: the Pentagon's policy of press pools during the Gulf War significantly restricted the press, and therefore, the public's access to information.(4) Second, subsequent to the three topics about disclosure is the question of whether a journalist is always obliged to keep a confidence. This year, in particular, the legal and moral rightness of naming one's sources was discussed in light of a Supreme Court ruling. Five issues, therefore, deserve our attention.

Wartime Coverage

Press pools were a rare phenomenon before Grenada.(5) From World War I until Vietnam a cooperative relationship existed between the military and the press: reporters were allowed to the front but had to submit their reports to government censorship.(6) Since Vietnam was an undeclared war, the military, unable to censor the press, countered with its own propaganda program. Existing collaboration collapsed under the weight of profound mutual suspicion until finally Secretary of State Dean Rusk asked one questioning reporter, "Whose side are you on anyway?"(7) Vietnam's legacy of suspicion deprives the press of the unrestricted access to the battlefield it once enjoyed.

For the development of this policy journalists blame themselves. Quoting Time's Washington Bureau Chief, Peter Schmeisser reports: "Throughout the long evolution of the Department of Defense pool, the press willingly, passively, and stupidly went along with it. That is the original sin which got us where we are, and I don't blame anybody as much as I blame us. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Fiduciary Responsibility
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.