Toward a Small Donor Democracy: The Past and Future of Incentive Programs for Small Political Contributions

By Cmar, Thomas | Fordham Urban Law Journal, May 2005 | Go to article overview

Toward a Small Donor Democracy: The Past and Future of Incentive Programs for Small Political Contributions


Cmar, Thomas, Fordham Urban Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

Money is the lifeblood of electoral politics. A political campaign is almost never successful unless its resources are comparable to those of its opponents--and the most important of these resources is money. As Alexander Heard described it, political money "is a universal, transferable unit infinitely more flexible in its uses than the time, or ideas, or talent, or influence, or controlled votes that also constitute contributions to politics." (1)

Money has always been crucial to political success, but for modern campaigns it has taken on a singular, overriding importance. In the 2002 congressional elections, 94% of the candidates who raised the most money won their races. (2) Winners out-raised losers approximately four to one. (3) The overwhelming correlation between fundraising success and electoral victory exists even in primary elections, where the partisan makeup of the district does not give any candidate an inherent advantage. The biggest fundraisers won primary elections in 2002 more than 90% of the time. (4) Incumbency plays an important role in these statistics: 92.7% of House incumbents and 85.7% of Senate incumbents who ran in 2002 won reelection. (5) The high re-election rate of incumbents, however, is due in no small part to their ability to raise large sums of money; in 2002, the average incumbent out-raised his or her opponent by a ratio of 4.5-to-1. (6)

The primacy of television advertising as a modern campaign tactic has increased the importance of money. Federal candidates, parties, and political action committees ("PACs") spent more than $1 billion on television advertising in 2002. (7) More than any other factor, television spending has contributed to an "arms race" mentality within political campaigns, steadily escalating from election cycle to election cycle without regard to the ads' consequences for democracy. (8) Rather than being a testament to the value of free speech, the modern campaign practice of raising millions of dollars in contributions from the privately wealthy and spending most of them on a large number of short, repetitive television advertisements undermines the societal interest in open and informed debate that is protected by the First Amendment. (9)

Voters collectively decide who represents them in elected office. The nature of the voters' decision, however, is determined by innumerable smaller decisions that precede it. These decisions--such as which candidates decide to run in the first place, and which candidates receive the opportunity to communicate their messages effectively to the electorate--are heavily influenced by the flow of political money. (10) By essentially determining which candidates are able to make it onto a given primary or general election ballot, donors help to define the field of possibility in American politics.

Despite the importance of monetary participation to the viability of political campaigns, the current federal system of campaign finance regulation creates huge obstacles to the equal participation of grassroots candidates of all parties and ideologies and the small donors who might otherwise support them. The 2004 presidential campaign showed that, in an election perceived to be of great historical significance, campaigns' growing use of the Internet to reach out to small donors can result in large numbers of small contributions to political campaigns. (11) In most successful political campaigns for federal office, however, small donors play only a marginal role. (12) Although congressional election campaigns reported more than $1 billion in total receipts for the 2002 election cycle, (13) only 24% of the money raised from individuals came in contributions under $200, accounting for less than 14% of candidates' total receipts. (14) By contrast, 55.5% of the money raised from individuals came in contributions of $1000 or more. (15) These large contributions came from only approximately 202,245 donors--less than 0.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Toward a Small Donor Democracy: The Past and Future of Incentive Programs for Small Political Contributions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.