Assessing the Special Education Faculty Shortage: The Crisis in California-A Statewide Study of the Professoriate

By Evans, Susan; Eliot, Michael et al. | Teacher Education Quarterly, Fall 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Assessing the Special Education Faculty Shortage: The Crisis in California-A Statewide Study of the Professoriate


Evans, Susan, Eliot, Michael, Hood, Jolene, Driggs, Max, Mori, Ayako, Johnson, Theresa, Teacher Education Quarterly


The imbalance of supply and demand for special education faculty continues to be a national concern (Smith, Pion, Tyler, & Gilmore, 2003; Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001). While the number of earned doctoral degrees awarded in special education in the United States has remained steady since 1992, at approximately 250 per year, fewer than half of recent graduates chose to pursue careers in higher education. With the number of vacancies for special education junior faculty averaging over 200 per year, more than one third of all job searches fail, resulting in the elimination of some positions, thus diminishing the nation's training and research capacity (Pion, Smith, & Tyler, 2003; Smith et al., 2001).

The discrepancy between the demand for special education faculty and the limited supply of qualified individuals has been attributed to several factors. The first factor is graduate immobility. In a national survey of 1,267 special education doctoral candidates, three-fourths of students applied to only one doctoral program at a university within 100 miles of their residence (Tyler, Smith, & Pion, 2003). Given that the median age for special education doctoral candidates is 42, unwillingness to relocate has been frequently cited by graduates as an issue in both doctoral program selection and job consideration upon graduation (Smith & Tyler, 1999).

A second factor is the large number of competing career opportunities which can offer graduates a significantly higher salary than they would receive as assistant professors. With beginning faculty salaries ranging from $35,000 to $50,000 per year, many recent graduates have rejected higher education careers (Hardman & West, 2003). Because of decreased federal funding for doctoral studies, many graduates face repayment of large student loans, providing motivation to look for higher paying positions outside of academia. Additional disincentives to higher education careers include the increased demands placed on new faculty members, such as heavy teaching loads (Pion et al, 2003) and the pressure to obtain outside funding (Smith et al., 2001). These issues heighten ongoing concerns about the aging of the special education professoriate (Smith & Salzberg, 1994; Tawney & DeHaas-Warner, 1993).

While the shortage of special education faculty is a nationwide concern, the problem is particularly acute in a number of regions in the country. In 2001, four Midwest states Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, and Indiana (with a total population of 40 million residents), had 328 enrolled special education doctoral students. By comparison, four West Coast states with the same size population, California, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada, had a combined doctoral enrollment of 157 students. Low doctoral enrollments were also reported in the central mountain states including Montana, North and South Dakota, Wyoming, and Nebraska, as well as northern New England, and southern states such as Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. In 2001, California, with a population of over 35 million residents, had only 54 special education doctoral candidates in the pipeline. By comparison, the states of New York and Texas (with a combined population equal in size to California) had, respectively, 162 and 135 doctoral students (Smith et al., 2001).

California has a geographic area larger than New England, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania combined, yet there are only seven institutions of higher education (IHEs) which offer a doctorate in special education, all with small enrollments. Between 1994 and 2000, these programs produced six special education doctorates per year for the entire state; only two graduates per year pursued careers in higher education (Smith et al., 2001). There are 42 colleges and universities in California offering one or more state-approved special education credentials. In 2002-03, more than 20 faculty openings in special education were advertised statewide, primarily at the assistant professor level in the area of high incidence disabilities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Assessing the Special Education Faculty Shortage: The Crisis in California-A Statewide Study of the Professoriate
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?