Looking for Wise Moves toward Iraq and Iran

By Davis, Charlie | National Catholic Reporter, October 21, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Looking for Wise Moves toward Iraq and Iran

Davis, Charlie, National Catholic Reporter

The October vote on Iraq's constitution will have taken place by the time this column is published, but events in Iraq and in this country make it clear that no matter the outcome of that vote or the vote in the Iraqi elections in December the support of the American people and Congress for the war has seriously eroded.

This means that whatever the statements of the president and the secretary of defense, the U.S. military presence will be seriously drawn down in Iraq beginning in 2006. And since our troops there are already insufficient in numbers to provide security, what are the likely consequences?

It is unlikely that indigenous Iraqi military forces will soon (if ever) be able to stand on their own. The ranks of the Iraqi army and the police are infiltrated by insurgents; the families of soldiers are being attacked by the resistance; and the Sunni political leadership on the side of the coalition is weak. In the future, even with stepped-up military training, it is unlikely that a significant number of competent Iraqi troops will be able to provide security, particularly in the Sunni areas. This will further weaken the Iraqi government's ability to overcome the insurgency and keep the country together. The most likely scenario in the next few years is that the country will, de facto, disintegrate into three semiautonomous regions controlled by Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis.

In this light, it is time to start thinking what U.S. responsibilities should be to the entities that make up the country and what new directions there should be for U.S. policies in the region, particularly toward Iran.

The Kurds, who already have their own independent army and some of Iraq's oil reserves, will continue to dominate the northeast of the country. What could be worrisome is the reaction of the Turks and the Iranians if the Kurds should appear too independent. Both Turkey and Iran have significant Kurdish minorities; neither wishes an outbreak of Kurdish nationalism within their own borders. To stem such a prospect, either country could invade the Iraqi Kurdish territory; the Turks did just that after the 1991 Gulf War. The United States has protected the Kurds from Saddam Hussein (and the Turks) since the early 1990s with combat air patrols. Our responsibility is to keep protecting them as long as the Kurds do not encourage irredentist elements in their neighboring states.

The Shiites in the south, with most of Iraq's oil reserves and population, will be happy if the Sunnis are isolated. The big concern for the United States is that Iran, with its overwhelming Shiite population, could seek to dominate the Shiite portion of Iraq. However, columnist Thomas L. Friedman wrote in the Sept. 28 New York Times: "The Brits [whose military forces are patrolling the Shiite region] ... will tell you, the Iraqi Arab Shiites here are obsessed with not being dominated by Iran."

If the United States can count on Shiite independence along with the relative independence of the Kurds with their oil supplies, then the flow of Iraqi oil will be relatively assured. More important is the U.S. obligation to the Shiite people. They thought the first Bush administration had promised them backing to rise up against Saddam Hussein after the 1991 Gulf War, but while the United States protected the Kurds, it neglected the Shiites--and the Iraqi president decimated the population. In the future, with continued U.S. and British military help, Iraqi Arab Shiites should be able to protect themselves from pressure from either the Sunnis or Iran. Shiite aspirations for self-rule will finally become a reality.

The three great concerns of U.S. policy in the region are: to contain elements that seek to foment terrorism, to have a secure supply of oil and to restrain Iran from developing nuclear weapons. For perspective, it is important to remember that the two greatest U.S. concerns after World War II were to contain the spread of communism and to prevent the Soviets from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Looking for Wise Moves toward Iraq and Iran


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?