Improving the Return-to-Work Process: A Strong Collaboration between EA Professionals and Occupational Health Physicians Can Result in More Accurate Evaluations of Sick and Injured Workers, Better Medical Outcomes, and Fewer Repeat Injuries or Illnesses

By Kovalesky, Bob | The Journal of Employee Assistance, October 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Improving the Return-to-Work Process: A Strong Collaboration between EA Professionals and Occupational Health Physicians Can Result in More Accurate Evaluations of Sick and Injured Workers, Better Medical Outcomes, and Fewer Repeat Injuries or Illnesses


Kovalesky, Bob, The Journal of Employee Assistance


As a full-time employee assistance professional for the past 15 years, I have been fascinated by the return-to-work process. Problems can arise unexpectedly. Some employees want to get back to the job quickly, perhaps risking further injury in their haste. Others seem to be on a prolonged holiday, with little concern for their future or their job security There is room for controversy if an employee leaves my office disappointed.

I have worked closely with occupational health physicians to evaluate employees' readiness to return to work and have always been impressed by the favorable results that obtain when EA professionals and doctors cooperate with each other. When they jointly focus their efforts on accurately evaluating an employee who is returning to work after an occupational injury or personal illness, they greatly enhance the decision-making process. The employee benefits in the long run, whether he/she agrees at the moment.

On occasion, I conduct return-to-work interviews in partnership with an occupational health physician who works in my building. The physician usually sees the patient first; if he/she detects a need for EAP involvement, the employee walks down the hall to my office. After talking to the employee, I discuss the case with the doctor. These onsite collaborations are extremely productive, since we are able to address both psychological and medical issues with the evaluations fresh in our minds.

UNIQUE METHODS OF DETECTION

Important decision-making protocols have developed from the cooperative evaluation process. The first decision to be made has three possible outcomes:

1. Return the employee to work;

2. Delay the return to duty and seek more information; or

3. Retain the employee on sick leave for a discrete period of time.

Depending on the person and the symptoms he/she displayed, 30 days often are a useful period of time to wait for a re-evaluation.

The second decision to be made focuses on complications that have arisen while the employee has been away from work or were never addressed in the past. These complications can be complex and almost always result in a delay in the employee's return to full duty There are three major issues that fit this description:

1. A new physical injury or illness;

2. Chemical dependency or substance abuse; and

3. Mental health issues that previously existed or have developed in the interim while the employee has been absent from work.

Knowing what to look for in terms of additional symptoms is crucial. I interviewed several physicians with whom I have worked to gather opinions about these complicating factors. Each described unique methods of detection.

Dr. Joseph Pursch is a psychiatrist who specializes in the treatment of chemical addictions. He collaborates with the EAP Committee when he conducts a return-to-work evaluation and calls me prior to assessing an employee to get as much information as possible about the person's behavior in the workplace. If any clinical reports or discharge summaries are available, he wants to see those as well.

Dr. Pursch has evaluated airline employees on behalf of the Federal Aviation Administration for many years. He is one of a select group of mental health professionals who evaluate employees in safety-sensitive positions for chemical dependency issues. Dr. Pursch described "the airline model," a standard used to evaluate airline personnel that consists of the following:

1. Inpatient treatment for at least 30 days;

2. Participation in 12-step meetings on a regular basis, starting with 90 meetings in 90 days as soon as treatment concludes;

3. Weekly participation in an aftercare group at a treatment center for at least two years;

4. A thorough evaluation by a psychiatrist, including a battery of psychological tests; and

5. Face-to-face monitoring by an EAP Committee at least once per month for a period of time that could extend from two to five years.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Improving the Return-to-Work Process: A Strong Collaboration between EA Professionals and Occupational Health Physicians Can Result in More Accurate Evaluations of Sick and Injured Workers, Better Medical Outcomes, and Fewer Repeat Injuries or Illnesses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?