Mill's Liberty, the Ribald Press, and the Politics of War

By Day, Benjamin | Canadian Journal of History, August 2005 | Go to article overview

Mill's Liberty, the Ribald Press, and the Politics of War


Day, Benjamin, Canadian Journal of History


I. Introduction

John Stuart Mill's On Liberty is one of the most enduring documents in the intellectual history of the English language. It is not merely debated by each subsequent generation of political theorists, but brought to bear in political struggles as a "spokes-text" of social groups in order to frame their visions of historical change. In part, this timelessness is by design: Mill purged the text of almost all direct references to contemporary individuals, organizations, and institutions. And this intentional abstraction of political philosophy from contemporary events has served him well for posterity. An immense body of secondary literature happily meets him on his own ground, discussing the (in)validity of distinctions between self- and other-regarding action, the meaningfulness of his "one very simple principle" (or whether it is actually very simple), and so on. And the text's basic arguments have proven adaptable to the long span of history's changing institutional settings and lines of conflict--institutions and conflicts often unimaginable from the book's mid-nineteenth-century, British context.

On Liberty was not, however, written for posterity. It was drafted as an intervention in a dramatic public furor over the politics of the Crimean War, a conflict whose apogee during 1855 and 1856 was the ferment out of which Mill first conceived and began to pen On Liberty, along with the initial drafts of many of his subsequent publications. In February 1855, Mill wrote in a letter to his wife:

   The more I think of the plan of a volume on Liberty, the more
   likely it seems to me that it will be read & make a sensation.
   The title itself with any known name to it would sell an edition.
   We must cram into it as much as possible of what we wish not
   to leave unsaid. (1)

What was happening in the Britain, even the world, of 1855 that there appeared to be such a public hunger for treatises on the subject of liberty that they would be devoured almost regardless of their content or author? What pressing questions hung in the air of Mill's England, to which a volume on liberty could offer answers? What events raised such questions? And what was the "sensation" that Mill expected? That it would it be trumpeted or reviled? By whom?

The dominant paradigm of Mill scholarship is poorly equipped to answer questions like these. With some late exceptions, (2) virtually all Mill research can be categorized as "classical intellectual history"--contextualizing Mill's thought more against the background of leading intellectuals of the day and their published writings, than in relation to social events and thinkers' embeddedness in politically and economically engaged social groups. While histories of ideas have almost disappeared from the landscape of mainstream historiography, historians of political thought have only slowly, and in rare instances, turned to social history. (3)

A look to the historical record offers answers to these questions, and provides us with a new understanding of On Liberty and its meaning: a meaning no less relevant to subsequent generations for having been plucked from the ether of abstraction.

On Liberty addressed itself to two major themes: the first was the threat to a population from its own government, through coercion from above and the erosion of citizens' rights to act and speak freely; the second was the more subtle danger--often not even recognized as a threat--that individuals might be led by their fellow citizens into uninformed, undeliberated, and enslaving beliefs through social pressure. This second theme was, in essence, a response to the role of public opinion in setting the course of historical change, and a critique of the process through which public opinion was often formed.

Mill was not the first to raise either of these questions, for they were the two primary questions kicked up by the Crimean War, fleshed out in debates over specific public policies, administrative actions, and a sequence of two serious ministerial crises.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Mill's Liberty, the Ribald Press, and the Politics of War
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.