Using Q & A in a Company Library: A Case Study

By Meyer, Sharon I.; Last, Kimberly L. | Special Libraries, Spring 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Using Q & A in a Company Library: A Case Study


Meyer, Sharon I., Last, Kimberly L., Special Libraries


Background

The Safety Information Center at Triodyne, Inc.. provides library services to the firm's engineers and scientists as well as fee-based research services for external clients. The library's diverse collection supports mechanical engineering, environmental engineering, human factors, vehicle operation and design, product liability, and safety engineering.

We estimate that there are about 160,000 potential machine-readable records in our collection, of which about 3% (the book collection) is catalogued through OCLC. The remaining resources include current and retrospective government reports, standards, patents, product literature, an extensive vertical file collection, vehicle manuals, a special collection on fire, and a collection of deposition transcripts. This proportion illustrates a problem many science-based libraries have: much of the working collection is nonjournal and nonbook material. Yet this is precisely the material that benefits most from fast access through standard bibliographic practices. Of the library staff of sixteen, only four catalog and maintain the files. Therefore, any file management activities have to be simple, fast, and easy to learn and implement.

Begun in 1979, the library became automated in the early '80s with the purchase and installation of digital-based (VAX) WPS-Plus/VMS. This software became the basis for eight separate collections. WPS-Plus/VMS provided the opportunity to create bibliographic records and list process them; subject searches and quick sorts were impossible. When other departments at Triodyne bought computers, they purchased IBM PCs and Macintoshes, thus establishing an environment under which noncompatible systems existed. The lack of standardization became a drain on productivity. After an executive-level evaluation, the company decided to develop a PC local area network (LAN), retain the Macs (essential for our graphic department), and concentrate on changing the library VAX to PCs.

To prepare for the switch to PCs, the library developed a plan that included the following: a description of current applications, a list of current library software, a "wish list" of future library applications, a list of desirable features (for instance, variable length fields, Boolean search features, networkable, import/export, and so forth), and a list of the equipment that would be needed. Our future applications list was a jumble of bibliographic, invoicing, administrative, and word processing requirements. We realized we needed a general-purpose software program that could be used to develop different kinds of databases, allowed searches, was user-friendly and easy to manage. Although the switch from VAX to PC was "mandated" from the top, we were optimistic that this was an opportunity to improve our day-to-day operations and speed up our year-end reporting process.

Evaluation

The library began by evaluating PC software (hardware requirements were handled later by our technical staff). One of our most immediate needs was to track the library's acquisitions activities and we kept that foremost in mind during the evaluation process.

The library was already using PARADOX, a relational database manager, and INMAGIC, a text manager, for special one-time-only applications. Because they were already in place, we considered them first. The librarians most closely involved with both strongly believed that PARADOX was too difficult for the existing staff and INMAGIC was not multifaceted enough for our needs.

After a review of the literature, it became apparent that flat-file database software had progressed to the point where it would meet our three basic criteria, that is, enable searches, be user friendly, and be easy to manage. We identified several candidates, obtained and studied review articles, ordered demo disks, set up a test database based on the acquisition files we wanted to track, and tested each demo. The test database included as many different kinds of acquisitions records as we could think of.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Using Q & A in a Company Library: A Case Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?