Rah Rah: Media Cheer on the Clinton 'Jobs Bill.' (How the Press Is Covering Bill Clinton's Economic Proposals) (Column)

By Bozell, L. Brent,, III | Insight on the News, June 21, 1993 | Go to article overview

Rah Rah: Media Cheer on the Clinton 'Jobs Bill.' (How the Press Is Covering Bill Clinton's Economic Proposals) (Column)


Bozell, L. Brent,, III, Insight on the News


Coverage of President Clinton's failed "stimulus" package served as a telling first glimpse of how the media will cover Clintonomics.

Sure, there's been debate in the press over Clinton's economic plans, but the tone has changed dramatically with this administration. National reporting continues to be enthralled with ever-growing government, now to the point of Orwellian dialogue: The president's planned $1 trillion addition to the debt is a - bingo - "deficit reduction plan."

The media's support for Clinton is coming through in the way they describe his economic programs.

Compare, for example, the coverage of George Bush's warmed-over support for a capital gains tax cut in 1989 with the Clinton emergency spending package. Both plans, intended to spur job growth, were killed in the Senate. A look at the network coverage in late 1989 found that the Bush plan was never described as a "jobs bill" or a "stimulus," but simply as a "capital gains tax cut" - intended to help the wealthy only. But in 1993, the networks have used the Democratic term "jobs bill" to describe the plan in 46 percent of all stories.

(Quick - did the media ever refer to Ronald Reagan's tax cut, which created 18 million new jobs, as a "jobs bill"?)

In the April 19 Newsweek, reporter Eleanor Clift noted the White House's pleasure with the trend: "Watching reports on CNN, a top aide noted that the network flashed |Jobs Bill' on the screen each time the impasse was discussed. |We'll take it,' he smiled, knowing a debate framed by jobs was one Clinton could win."

CBS has been most outrageous in its blatant cheerleading. While the other networks described the Clinton package as a "jobs bill" or "jobs creation bill" in 31 percent of news stories, CBS used the terms in 83 percent of its segments.

CBS repeatedly portrays the "stimulus" package's holdup as a tragedy. On April 2, anchor Connie Chung reported: "The government says the unemployment rate held at 7 percent last month. Held up in the Senate is President Clinton's $16 billion program to bring unemployment down. Opponents are blocking a final vote." On April 6, reporter Bill Plante explicitly hit the GOP: "At an unemployment office in Fairfax, Va., they don't understand why politics is getting in the way of helping people find work." On April 21, Dan Rather intoned: "Clinton's big jobs bill is still being held prisoner in Congress tonight."

Where were these same reporters in 1989 when a Democratic Senate blocked the Republican capital gains tax cut? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Rah Rah: Media Cheer on the Clinton 'Jobs Bill.' (How the Press Is Covering Bill Clinton's Economic Proposals) (Column)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.