The Future of the National Endowment for the Arts

Berger, Maurice, Feldman, Ronald, Artforum International

Last November, the Democratic National Committee asked New York gallerist Ronald Feldman to submit documents to the transition team of President-Elect Bill Clinton in support of the National Endowment for the Arts. To write the proposal Feldman enlisted Maurice Berger, a frequent contributor to Artforum. The proposal, which we are happy to publish below, was sent to the president-elect in early December with supporting signatures representing a broad spectrum of the nation's cultural communities.

Over the past 12 years, our country has faced a serious crisis as a powerful minority of religious and political activists has attempted to stifle cultural freedom. For artists and other cultural figures, no form of interference has been more dramatic than the destructive limitations imposed on the National Endowment for the Arts since 1981. During the past decade, the NEA, an organization established to further the availability and excellence of the arts in the United States, has been under attack, its programs and awards subject to arbitrary acts of censorship and repression. The Endowment's own history--a political legacy of difficult birth in the 1960s, …

Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: The Future of the National Endowment for the Arts. Contributors: Berger, Maurice - Author, Feldman, Ronald - Author. Magazine title: Artforum International. Volume: 31. Issue: 5 Publication date: January 1993. Page number: 72+. © 1999 Artforum International Magazine, Inc. COPYRIGHT 1993 Gale Group.

This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.