Internet Sexuality Research with Rural Men Who Have Sex with Men: Can We Recruit and Retain Them?

By Bowen, Anne | The Journal of Sex Research, November 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Internet Sexuality Research with Rural Men Who Have Sex with Men: Can We Recruit and Retain Them?


Bowen, Anne, The Journal of Sex Research


HIV seroprevalence in rural areas has increased steadily since 1982 (Lam & Liu, 1994). In rural areas, men who have sex with men (MSM) account for a majority of the HIV/AIDs cases (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001). Quantitative research studies with rural MSM are sparse, probably because traditional methods of recruiting are difficult with such highly stigmatized groups, and the travel expenses required to make face-to-face contact are high. The emergence of the internet, both as a virtual social community and as a research tool, presents an excellent opportunity for contacting rural populations. Rural people, particularly rural MSM, are rapidly increasing their use of the internet (Bell, Reddy, & Rainie, 2001), rural MSM in particular. In Wyoming (Williams, Bowen, & Horvath, 2005), MSM indicate that the internet is a primary resource for making contact with other MSM and that internet-delivered risk reduction interventions would be welcomed.

The internet's accessibility, affordability, anonymity (Cooper, 1998), and acceptability (King, 1999) make it especially attractive for research with hidden and stigmatized groups. Anyone with access to a computer and a modern is a potential participant, and respondents may access the research at a time and place convenient to them (Binik, 2001; Mustanski, 2001). Internet data collection is rapid and reasonably inexpensive, and large numbers of participants can be recruited from diverse locations (Cooper, Scherer, & Mathy, 2001). Samples appear to provide more variability than face-to-face interviews (Ross, Tikkanen, & Mansson, 2000; Tikkanen & Ross, 2000). Also, surveys can be tailored to the participants' responses and branching is invisible, thus lowering the participant burden.

Conversely, the internal validity of internet research may be threatened if participants feel less pressure to complete surveys (Frick, Bachtiger, & Reips, 2001), resulting in high "hit" to completion rates (Birnbaum & Mellers, 1989; Ross, Danebeck, Mansson, Tikkanen, & Cooper, 2003) or early abandonment (Crawford, Couper, & Lamias, 2001). Studies with urban MSM support this concern. For example, Ross, Rosser, Stanton, and Konstan (2004) recruited Latino MSM for an internet study and received 33,024 clicks on their banner ads. While 1,742 (5%) of the "click through" men qualified for the study and said they wanted to enroll, only 1,546 (89%) initiated the questionnaire. The survey completion rate for initiators was 65.4%. Similar hit to initiation (0.7%) and survey completion rates (51.2%) were reported by Ross et al. (2003) in their internet study of Swedish MSM. On the other hand, Elford, Bolding, Davis, Sherr, and Hart (2004) conducted an online survey of MSM in London, and although they did not report absolute completion rates, 97% of 1,250 men provided sufficient data to examine HIV status and sexual risk behaviors.

Three important outcomes should be noted from these studies: web banners attract urban MSM, including minorities; banners successfully recruit large numbers of initiators; and survey completion rates are often low. Ross et al. (2004) identified some correlates of completion among their urban participants. The men identified their preferred reimbursement method prior to initiating the questionnaire, and dropouts were more likely to have rejected the $20 compensation or offered it to a charity. Other correlates of dropping out included having not met men for sex on the internet, identifying as bi- or heterosexual, and using the internet less at home. Bull, Lloyd, Rietmeijer, and McFarlane (2004), in an internet-based prevention program for MSM, cited lack of contact information and inadequate incentives as primary issues leading to only 13% retention at the one-month follow-up. Meaningful compensation has also been identified as a successful retention strategy in non-internet studies (Leonard et al., 2003).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Internet Sexuality Research with Rural Men Who Have Sex with Men: Can We Recruit and Retain Them?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?