Mission Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Workload Analysis

By Dixon, Stephen R.; Wickens, Christopher D. et al. | Human Factors, Fall 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Mission Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Workload Analysis


Dixon, Stephen R., Wickens, Christopher D., Chang, Dervon, Human Factors


INTRODUCTION

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide many benefits over manned systems, including having smaller platforms, being more cost efficient, enabling longer mission times, allowing flight control that may not be possible with manned aircraft (e.g., higher g forces and deeper enemy penetration), and avoiding loss of human life. UAVs allow for a variety of civilian and military missions not previously available with manned aircraft (Gawron, 1998) and allow these missions to be flown without endangering the pilots, who remain at remote control stations (Mouloua, Gilson, & Hancock, 2005).

Currently the U.S. Army flies two of its UAVs, the Hunter and Shadow (short- to medium-range tactical reconnaissance UAVs), with two operators for each vehicle. In order to increase the number of UAVs flying without increasing personnel requirements, there is interest in having a single pilot fly one UAV or even two UAVs concurrently. Given the multitasking nature of UAV missions, the concern is that achieving these goals could create serious workload problems.

In order to establish the feasibility of this goal, two approaches--pilot-in-the-loop simulation and computational modeling--should be taken in parallel. The first approach is to evaluate ways of reducing unacceptable workload levels that a 1:1 and, in particular, a 1:2 operator-to-aircraft ratio will impose on the single operator. In our UAV simulation, crafted from interviews with subject-matter experts (U.S. Army UAV pilots attached to E Company, 305th Military Intelligence Battalion), the control of each of two UAV workstations involves three major visually distributed subtasks: (a) mission completion, which involves navigating the UAV between command targets and reporting information at those locations; (b) monitoring the health of various on-board system parameters in order to detect and respond to periodic system failures; and (c) surveillance of the ground beneath each path through a 3-D camera image to find well-camouflaged "targets of opportunity" (TOOs) and then identify them through demanding image manipulation (Gugerty & Brooks, 2001). In a sense, Task a is the primary mission task, Task b supports the mission completion, and Task c can be represented as a valuable secondary task that increases the productivity of a UAV mission. In our simulation, two of these tasks are augmented by automation: an autopilot can handle all aspects of navigating the UAV (but provides no benefit to the command target report portion of this task), and an autoalert system can replace visual monitoring with auditory detection of system failures.

The second approach is to develop a computational model of multitask-processing assumptions about the pilot-UAV system in order to predict how these and other workload-relevant modifications to the system might influence pilot workload (Laughery & Corker, 1997; Waiters, Huber, French, & Barnes, 2002). Doing so can greatly reduce the time and expense of pilot-in-the-loop simulations. If the model is validated, then questions can be answered more rapidly regarding workload implications of automation and pilot-vehicle ratio modifications of the type described. The current article focuses primarily on the first approach.

A review of the literature indicates that although many human factors issues--display design, crew coordination, time delays, and so forth--have been noted in the UAV paradigm (e.g., Gawron, 1998; Mouloua et al., 2003), few of these issues have been resolved through experimental control. Previous UAV research has focused primarily on single-UAV operation (e.g., Gugerty & Brooks, 2001; Veltman & Oving, 2003), primarily via part-task simulations with few, if any, attempts to generalize to multiple-UAV operation. Other research has focused on controlling multiple robotic objects such as missiles (e.g., Cummings & Guerlain, 2003); however, these types of robotics are fairly simple to operate and make fewer demands on resources than do complex UAV systems.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Mission Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Workload Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?