On Hamas "Freedom-Fighters": The View from International Law
Beres, Louis Rene, Midstream
Even now, even after repeated Hamas bomb attacks on Israeli buses, nurseries, and preschools, some will argue passionately that the ends of such barbaric Palestinian violence justify the means--that an end to the so-called Israeli "occupation" justifies premeditated murder of "any and all Israelis." Leaving aside both ordinary ethical standards (by which this argument is manifestly indecent), and the fact that Israel came into inadvertent control of the West Bank and Gaza in 1967 because of utterly undisguised Arab aggression, the ends never justify the means under authoritative international law. On the contrary, for more than two thousand years, binding legal rules of world politics have stipulated that intentional violence against the innocent is always repugnant and always prohibited.
How often have we heard the claim that one man's terrorist is another man's ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: On Hamas "Freedom-Fighters": The View from International Law.
Contributors: Beres, Louis Rene - Author.
Magazine title: Midstream.
Volume: 51.
Issue: 6
Publication date: November-December 2005.
Page number: 19+.
© 2009 Theodor Herzl Foundation.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset