After Kass: The Future of the President's Council on Bioethics
Lustig, Andrew, Commonweal
On October 1, Leon Kass stepped down as chairman of the President's Council on Bioethics. Kass was succeeded by one of the "founding fathers" of modern bioethics, Edmund Pellegrino, professor emeritus of medicine and medical ethics and adjunct professor of philosophy at Georgetown University.
Kass garnered his share of fans and critics as head of the council, and his departure hasn't gone unnoticed by them. In contrast to the "topic of the week" mentality that characterizes most discussions in bioethics, Kass laudably pursued a broader educational function for the council. Many bioethicists, in their desire to achieve political consensus on divisive issues, focus primarily on procedural matters. Deeper questions--about human nature, the meanings of parenting as a social practice, etc.--are often bracketed as being beyond resolution, according to the canons of postmodernism and the predilections of many secularists. By contrast, Kass explicitly set a more ambitious goal, the pursuit of what he called a "richer vision" for bioethics.
That vision was addressed in the council's seven reports over the past four years. In those documents, Kass's council asked the "big questions" posed by cloning, stem-cell research, the uses of biotechnology in human reproduction, and, most recently, the challenges of an aging population. While not indifferent to practical questions, the reports' authors were not shy about their more metaphysical interests.
Two examples are worth noting here. As I mentioned in a previous column ("Immortality," February 13, 2004), in Beyond Therapy, the council assessed a wide range of supposed developments in biotechnology--from attempts to make "better babies" through embryo screening to efforts to recast aging as a conquerable disease. "Advances" in biotechnology, the report insisted, are less about technology itself than about how "human desires ... may be transformed and inflated by the new technological powers we are acquiring."
In its most recent report, Taking Care: Ethical Caregiving in an Aging Society, the council acknowledges the pressing economic issues raised by shifting demographics, but challenges the usual bioethics emphasis on preserving personal autonomy. Instead, the report focuses on the obligations of responsible care. "The moral emphasis on choosing in advance needs to be replaced with a moral emphasis on caring in the present. The moral emphasis on independence needs to be supplemented with a moral commitment to serve the lives of those we love regardless of their disabilities." In effect, the report makes a compelling argument for an ethic of genuine equality. As both givers and receivers of care, we are of equal worth in our humanity, whatever our cognitive function or physical condition. As …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: After Kass: The Future of the President's Council on Bioethics. Contributors: Lustig, Andrew - Author. Magazine title: Commonweal. Volume: 132. Issue: 21 Publication date: December 2, 2005. Page number: 7+. © 1999 Commonweal Foundation. COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.