Public Attitudes and Fear of Crime Victimization: Assessing the Role of Attitude Formation Theory

By Fairhead, Kerry; Pfeifer, Jeffrey et al. | Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, June 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Public Attitudes and Fear of Crime Victimization: Assessing the Role of Attitude Formation Theory


Fairhead, Kerry, Pfeifer, Jeffrey, Thompson, Donald, Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services


A review of the current literature indicates that, despite the large quantity of research on fear of crime, it has remained an elusive concept that is difficult to measure and assess. Research findings on this issue are varied and often contradictory and, in general, appear to lack a synthesizing theory. This lack of synthesis appears to be especially prevalent with regard to an understanding of public perceptions of crime in general versus public perceptions of specific crimes. It is suggested that the application of attitude formation and response theory might provide a more comprehensive understanding of this general/specific fear of crime issue. Specifically, it is argued that attitude formation and response theory might better explain why public perceptions of general and specific crimes are skewed and what cognitive factors lead to this discrepancy. As such, the current study had two major objectives. The first goal of this study was to compare perceived and actual crime rates to determine if people are able to accurately assess the occurrence of both general and specific crime in their areas. The second of the research was to apply attitude formation theory to interpret fear of crime, specifically with regard to cognitive antecedents and responses. As expected, results indicate that subjects are inaccurate in their assessment of general crime rates but very accurate in terms of their assessment of specific crime rates. In addition, there was a significant relationship between subjects' attitudinal antecedents and their responses regarding fear of crime. Findings are discussed in terms of improvements to the measurement of fear of crime and associated responses to this phenomenon.

The past two decades have witnessed a dramatic increase in research on peoples' perceptions of crime and their associated feelings of safety and security (see e.g., Farrall, Bannister, Ditton & Gilchrist, 1997). Surveys of the community are regularly conducted by police services, government agencies and academic researchers to assess levels of worry and perceived prevalence of crime. Such data may be used to identify specific areas of concern, target programs for improving safety and security, or to better understand peoples' assessments and concerns about crime. Some police services even incorporate community perceptions of crime risk and feelings of safety as performance indicators equal to that of the actual offence rate. In Western Australia, for example, one of the five core functions of the Police Service is maintenance of the peace. This core function includes preserving public order and promoting a sense of security in the community and a primary performance measure of this function is the proportion of the community who feel safe and secure (Western Australia Police Service, 1999).

Although there has been a great deal of so called 'fear of crime' inquiry, researchers often have difficulty defining what exactly fear of crime characterizes (Farrall et al., 1997). Broadly speaking, fear of crime has encompassed measures ranging from affective fear reactions in specific settings (Nasar & Jones, 1997; van der Wurff, van Staalduinen & Stringer, 1989) through to individual assessments of crime risk or prevalence (O'Connell & Whelan, 1996; Rountree & Land, 1996b). Depending on the theoretical focus of the research, methodology of the study, and/or interpretation of the investigator(s), numerous conflicting findings have been reported (Farrall et al., 1997). Ongoing disagreement by researchers over the structure and measurement of fear of crime, along with persisting discrepancies amid research data, appear to characterize this field of study.

The fact that perceptions of safety and fear of crime have been so rigorously investigated, and that research findings have become so important to law enforcement and community leaders, highlights the importance of continued empirical examination of this area.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Public Attitudes and Fear of Crime Victimization: Assessing the Role of Attitude Formation Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?