Perceived Social and Cultural Gaps: Views of Senior Canadian Forces Officers

By Hill, Sarah A. | Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, September 2004 | Go to article overview

Perceived Social and Cultural Gaps: Views of Senior Canadian Forces Officers


Hill, Sarah A., Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services


This article explores the perceptions of differences and similarities between the military and civilian cultures, based on an analysis of survey responses from a purposive sample of 168 senior Canadian Forces (CF) officers. The study is set within the context of change initiated within the military institution to make it more responsive to Canadian government policy, and more sensitive to value and norm changes within the host society. Perceptions of military and civilian values, military and civilian culture, and perceptions of the relationship between military and civilian authorities were examined in this study. Some evidence of social and cultural gaps is suggested by the findings. In particular, a majority of this sample of military officers misperceive public sentiment and support for the military as less positive than it actually is, identify as military responsibilities some of the roles that are more appropriately the prerogatives of the government and politicians, and tend to see military values as morally superior to those of civilian society. These findings suggest areas of potential friction in civil-military relations, as well as pointing to the importance of obtaining multiple perspectives on issues as complex as modern civil-military relations. Suggestions for officer orientation and for continued research in the area of civil-military relations are offered.

INTRODUCTION

Civil-Military Relations

Since the end of the Cold War, civil-military relations has become an important topic of re-examination and debate among military analysts in both liberal-democratic societies of the West and those attempting to establish democratic regimes elsewhere (Bland, 1999a; Cottey, Edmunds & Forster, 2002; Burk, 2002). Part of civil-military relations includes relationships of the military to its host society and to governments/politicians, and has long been an issue of interest to social scientists, especially political scientists and sociologists. The clearest early statements of this relationship were those of political scientist Samuel Huntington (1957) and sociologist Morris Janowitz (1971), both of whom based most of their observations on the United States (U.S.) military profession in the conscription era. In conceptual writings that are well known among scholars of armed forces and society, Huntington saw the military as being set quite apart from its host society on a number of dimensions. He argued that this was as it should be, if the military was to effectively address its mission and perform its major professional role: that is, defend the nation through the management and execution of large-scale violence when legitimately called upon to do so. Huntington depicted civil and military spheres as separate areas of activity. A military profession that regarded its role strictly in military terms and was conservative in its social values, beliefs and attitudes, would remain a politically neutral arm of government, and thus would be more amenable to political direction and civilian control.

Janowitz (1971), on the other hand, saw the military institution as deeply embedded in its host society and dependent on it to effectively perform its responsibilities--though its unique mission rendered it somewhat different from other societal institutions and organizations. However, it had to reflect the values and the sensibilities of liberal-democratic society, if it was to enjoy legitimacy and support from the citizenry. What this meant was that the military was to be adaptive to external change, which, indeed, Janowitz documented in The Professional Soldier (1971). This included broadening the social base of the military profession and the ascendance of dominant leadership and managerial models more in keeping with those of a democratic, technologically progressive society. Janowitz viewed the military in much broader terms than just a warfighting machine and the profession as just a group of conservative "heroic warriors", insulated from the rest of society. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Perceived Social and Cultural Gaps: Views of Senior Canadian Forces Officers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.