Why We Need to Replace This Half-Baked Freedom Law with a Powerful One Based on the American Model

Western Mail (Cardiff, Wales), January 2, 2006 | Go to article overview

Why We Need to Replace This Half-Baked Freedom Law with a Powerful One Based on the American Model


Byline: By Martin Shipton Western Mail

It is now a full year since the UK's Freedom of Information Act came into effect, and despite the step forward that it represents, we clearly need a new Act that goes further. The present Act gives far too much leeway to politicians and officials who want to keep material secret if it is likely to embarrass them.

To appreciate the restrictive nature of the current Act, I remind myself of the true freedom I had a taste of 15 years ago when using the much more powerful Freedom of Information Act in the United States. At the time, I was working for a paper in the north-east of England, looking into applications by a Californian waste company to build two toxic waste incinerators in partnership with the then recently privatised regional water company.

After persuading my editor to send me to San Francisco for 11 days, I used FoI to gain full access to the files held by various public authorities on the waste company. Visiting the public bodies, I was amazed to find myself handed series of files so thick that I needed a trolley to wheel them to a desk. Trawling through the material, I found an immense amount damaging to the company. I compiled a lengthy report based on the documents that appeared in a special supplement of my paper under the headline, 'Damning Trail of Incompetence'. The supplement was published on the first day of a public inquiry into the incinerator applications, and I handed the documentation I had gathered to the objectors, who subsequently won their case.

This experience is the benchmark against which I judge the UK Freedom of Information Act. I have no doubt that much of the material I gathered in San Francisco would have been classed as 'exempt' information under our Act. I certainly would not have been allowed to roam through the files of Defra, or whichever government department held the material I was seeking. The civil servant charged with deciding what should be released to me would have had an armoury of opportunities to withhold whatever was considered too sensitive. Any legal advice would be kept back on the grounds of 'legal professional privilege'. Documents regarded as 'commercially confidential' would have been excluded, much to the relief of the company concerned. Advice to ministers would not have been included, because it would inhibit the 'free and frank' flow of briefing papers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why We Need to Replace This Half-Baked Freedom Law with a Powerful One Based on the American Model
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.