Opium Production Soars: The UK Foreign Affairs Committee on International Terrorism Has Delivered a Disturbing Report on Afghanistan's Drug Trade, Which Reveals the Country's Cultivation of Poppies, Already the Highest in the World in 2003, Will Increase Even Further This Year

By Willems, Peter | The Middle East, October 2004 | Go to article overview

Opium Production Soars: The UK Foreign Affairs Committee on International Terrorism Has Delivered a Disturbing Report on Afghanistan's Drug Trade, Which Reveals the Country's Cultivation of Poppies, Already the Highest in the World in 2003, Will Increase Even Further This Year


Willems, Peter, The Middle East


WITH THE GOVERNMENT HAVING little control outside Kabul, and farmers choosing the most profitable crop, opium production has flourished since the Taliban regime was ousted in late 2001. In 2003, over 80,000 hectares were used for poppy cultivation and the country produced 3,600 tons of opium--up from 185 tons in 2001--taking up 75% of the world market. The drug trade accounts for half of the country's gross domestic product (GDP).

When British Prime Minister Tony Blair spoke at a Labour Party conference in October 2001 to gain support for the invasion of Afghanistan, he mentioned that on top of ousting the Taliban regime and destroying Al Qaeda training camps, the attack would eliminate a major supply of heroin.

"Ninety per cent of the heroin on British streets originates in Afghanistan," said Blair. "The arms the Taliban are buying today are paid for with the lives of people buying their drugs on British streets. That is another part of their regime we should seek to destroy."

However, over the intervening years far from being eradicated, the lucrative poppy trade in Afghanistan has gone from strength to strength. It is forecast that land for poppy cultivation will increase to between 90,000 and 120,000 hectares this year. "Our assessment of poppy cultivation has not been completed, but indicators show that cultivation continued to rise in 2004," said Alexandre Schmidt, crime prevention expert of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Earlier this year, the Afghan government implemented an eradication programme to start its war on the drug industry. According to Afghanistan's Counter Narcotics Directorate, 25,000 hectares of poppy fields were destroyed in late spring and early summer.

But according to officials, the programme had little effect since farmers harvested the poppies before the destruction of fields began.

"To please the international audience, the eradication procedures that took place were nothing but a show," said Azizullah Lodin, president of the General Administration of Anti-Bribery and Corruption. "They were late destroying the poppies, so the farmers had already harvested the fields."

More alarming is the absence of a plan to help Afghan farmers find an alternative crop.

"There has been an immediate focus on eradication with little focus on what happens afterwards," said Schmidt. "September was the time to plant poppies again. What are people going to do while they need to earn a living? There is no other choice but to plant poppies."

It is estimated that farmers can receive up to $125,000 per hectare for growing poppies, compared to $215 per hectare for wheat. Many farmers say they are not against changing to another crop but are angry that they are left with no assistance after losing their best source of income.

"If they give us seeds, help us rebuild irrigation facilities and it is good for the nation, we will grow something else," said Jamal Jaffery, a farmer in the Herat province where poppy fields were destroyed. "But if there is nothing else to grow, we will have no choice but to grow poppies."

Rebuilding Afghanistan is also vital for farmers to be able to move away from cultivating poppies. After years of ongoing warfare, roads have been left in a shambles, which has made it difficult for farmers to ship produce to markets. Irrigation facilities have been destroyed, so farmers rely on poppies that require less water than most other crops.

But reconstructing Afghanistan has been slow. President Hamid Karzai requested $27.5bn over a seven-year period to rebuild the country soon after he took office in 2001, but money coming in from donor countries has not kept up with the amount needed each year. The Bush administration has diverted military and financial resources from Afghanistan to the war in Iraq. To rebuild the two countries, the United States has come up with $2.2bn for Afghanistan and $18.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Opium Production Soars: The UK Foreign Affairs Committee on International Terrorism Has Delivered a Disturbing Report on Afghanistan's Drug Trade, Which Reveals the Country's Cultivation of Poppies, Already the Highest in the World in 2003, Will Increase Even Further This Year
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.