Reconstructing the American South-After Katrina; Jim Downs Finds That the Reasons the Federal Government Was Slow to Respond to Hurricane Katrina Are Rooted in the South's Racial and Economic History, and Wonders If the Catastrophe May Lead at Last to Genuine Reconstruction

By Downs, Jim | History Today, January 2006 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Reconstructing the American South-After Katrina; Jim Downs Finds That the Reasons the Federal Government Was Slow to Respond to Hurricane Katrina Are Rooted in the South's Racial and Economic History, and Wonders If the Catastrophe May Lead at Last to Genuine Reconstruction


Downs, Jim, History Today


THE CHAOS THAT STRUCK THE GULF COAST in the aftermath of the 2005 hurricane season has created a stir among American historians. Some have looked back to the trail of devastation left by other major hurricanes in the twentieth century, and have even drawn parallels with natural disasters such as the San Francisco earthquake of 1906. Some, making comparisons with historical events that are unrelated to natural disaster or environmental destruction, have pointed to the possibility of Hurricane Katrina igniting a social movement similar to the labor strikes of the early twentieth century and the Civil Rights demonstrations of the 1960s. Yet others have argued that there is little historical precedent for what is unfolding in Mississippi, Louisiana and, more recently, Texas, and that a new mode of analysis and framework is required to situate these events.

While all of these perspectives offer a fresh insight into the aftermath of the hurricane, what has not been much discussed is the distinct history of New Orleans. A reminder of this history reveals how the events and discourse that followed the hurricane's disastrous impact--the massive dislocation, the failure of the Federal government to respond promptly, and the sharp rise in poverty--are not new; a similar pattern can be traced in the aftermath of the Civil War and the emancipation of slaves in the 1860s. Of course, those events unfolded over the course of years, while the hurricane destroyed and dismantled an entire region of a country within hours. But how people--both in and beyond the government--are responding to this present disaster has resonances in earlier US history.

In April 1862, Union forces made their way up the Mississippi River past two Confederate forts and captured New Orleans. Despite the victory, officials in the Union army wrote to their commanding officers describing the sheer devastation of the city in which homes had been destroyed and bridges collapsed. People--black, white, free and enslaved--were without shelter, food, or the means to leave, and within a few days, yellow fever tore through the city. Reports of black vomit filling the city's streets soon dominated the military correspondence. Union officials and local physicians called for immediate Federal support to stop the disease from spreading, but officials in Washington were to slow to respond. Eventually General Benjamin Butler, a leading official in the Union Army, was dispatched to New Orleans, where he immediately devised a plan 'to purify and to clean the city' by employing all able-bodied men in the work of reconstruction. Such a plan, Butler assumed, would kill two birds with one stone: those employed in rebuilding the city would no longer depend on the Federal government for food, shelter, and support.

The problem, however, was that in the first weeks of his reconstruction efforts Butler only employed white men. This left hundreds, if not thousands, of black men, women, and children without means of survival, a situation that led to newspapers, military correspondence, and government reports describing emancipated slaves as indolent and unwilling to work. Compounding matters, the Federal government failed to deliver resources to New Orleans, straining Butler's seemingly tenuous plan.

A massive migration out of New Orleans ensued as formerly enslaved men, women and children poured out of the city in search of work and shelter, or to find lost family members. They travelled down the Mississippi, making stops on former plantations in the Natchez district, staying for days, sometimes weeks, in the hope of eking a livelihood on the devastated and infertile lands north of New Orleans. They also went east and west, and in any direction in between, in which the government promised employment.

By the end of the war in 1865 the lack of work, shelter, and food throughout the South had displaced thousands of emancipated slaves. In an attempt to intervene, the Federal government created the Freedmen's Bureau, an institution designed to help those suffering from the outcome of the war to find employment, secure land, obtain medical treatment, and even receive an education.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Reconstructing the American South-After Katrina; Jim Downs Finds That the Reasons the Federal Government Was Slow to Respond to Hurricane Katrina Are Rooted in the South's Racial and Economic History, and Wonders If the Catastrophe May Lead at Last to Genuine Reconstruction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?