Al Qaeda a Bigger Threat Than the Nazis? I Beg to Differ Mr Reid .

Daily Mail (London), February 21, 2006 | Go to article overview

Al Qaeda a Bigger Threat Than the Nazis? I Beg to Differ Mr Reid .


Byline: CORRELLI BARNETT

An eminent war historian exposes this shameful claim as a cynical exercise to win support for Labour's dangerous newanti-terror laws

JOHN REID, Secretary of State for Defence and Tony Blair's aggressive 'Glasgow glasser', pronounced yesterday in a lecture that the danger from Al Qaeda to this country was worse than that posed by Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.

He said that while Hitler had used some of the same evil methods as Al Qaeda, 'never have we faced an enemy that embraced them all on such a scale'.

Al Qaeda fanatics, according to Reid, 'set out to cause the greatest pain they can to innocent people', all with the purpose of terrorising civilian populations. Moreover, Al Qaeda 'is an enemy unfettered by any sense of morality'.

Let's be clear straight away: when Reid places Al Qaeda in the same category of mortal danger to this country as Adolf Hitler, or even in the same category of evil, he is talking absolute tosh - as he well ought to know, considering he holds a university degree in history.

For a start, in regard to the question of comparative evil, how can Reid equate Al Qaeda's kidnapping and murder of innocent individuals such as Margaret Hassan and Ken Bigley in Iraq, cruel though such acts are, with Nazi Germany's industrialised murder of some six million Jews, gipsies and mental defectives? The comparison is simply ludicrous.

And even if we add up the hundreds of innocent victims cumulatively slaughtered over the years in Al Qaeda bomb outrages such as Bali, Madrid, and London last July - even if we also add the 3,000 killed in the destruction of the World Trade Centre on 9/11 -- the total comes to a tiny fraction of the number herded by the SS into the gas chambers.

When John Reid told his audience yesterday that Al Qaeda 'is an enemy unfettered by any sense of morality', the implication clearly was that Hitler by comparison was fettered by some sense of morality.

How, then, would Dr Reid the historian square that with the fact of 'the Final Solution', surely the most evil act in all history?

Then again, if Dr Reid compares the totals of civilian casualties inflicted by bombs alone by Nazi Germany and by Al Qaeda, he will find Al Qaeda's puny efforts far outstripped by the wartime Luftwaffe.

German bombers destroyed the centre of Warsaw in September 1939 and Rotterdam in May 1940. Along with the V-1 flying bombs and V-2 rockets, German bombers killed no fewer than 60,000 civilian men, women and children in Great Britain between 1940 and 1945.

What's more, these terror attacks were far more effective as a means of spreading fear among the British civilian population than any sporadic atrocities that Al Qaeda might perpetrate.

Dr Reid attempts to place Hitler and Al Qaeda in the same bracket in terms of a threat to the life and liberty of the British nation. The attempt is utterly preposterous.

However, it is part and parcel of Bush's and Blair's long-term campaign to glorify Al Qaeda as a mortal threat - a threat that can only be parried by 'a war'.

If Dr Reid - and his boss - do not understand the difference between sporadic smallscale terrorist outrages and 'war', especially war with Hitler, let me try to explain it for their benefit.

In the first place, there is the scale of the threat. Al Qaeda can never amount to more than a nuisance, albeit a cruel one.

Even if it could mount weekly bombings on the scale of London last July, it still could not bring about the disruption of Britain's economic life, let alone menace the stability of British society and endanger our liberties.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Al Qaeda a Bigger Threat Than the Nazis? I Beg to Differ Mr Reid .
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.