Private International Law - Civil Procedure - Hague Conference Approves Uniform Rules of Enforcement for International Forum Selection Clauses

Harvard Law Review, January 2006 | Go to article overview

Private International Law - Civil Procedure - Hague Conference Approves Uniform Rules of Enforcement for International Forum Selection Clauses


PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW--CIVIL PROCEDURE--HAGUE CONFERENCE APPROVES UNIFORM RULES OF ENFORCEMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES.--Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, concluded June 30, 2005.

Trade is greatly facilitated when international parties can make contracts safe in the knowledge that their disputes will be recognized and resolved in the forum of their choice. Yet legal systems may fail to protect these reasonable expectations. Recently, the member states of the Hague Conference on Private International Law approved the Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, (1) which lays out uniform rules for the enforcement of international choice of court clauses. The Convention not only requires that courts in member states assume jurisdiction pursuant to certain forum selection agreements between businesses around the world, but also lays out rules for the recognition of judgments thereby entered. These provisions will--if signed and ratified by the United States--render immaterial difficult Erie (2) questions regarding which law federal courts should apply to such agreements. Moreover, the Convention may also serve as a catalyst for standardized treatment of domestic forum selection clauses among the states and may later promote a much-needed legislative standardization of domestic jurisdictional law. (3)

In 1992, the United States spearheaded a project with the Hague Conference on Private International Law (4) to draft a worldwide convention on the recognition and enforcement of judgments in international civil law. (5) Increasing reliance on cross-border trade had exposed limitations in the legal framework for dealing with international civil litigation; as one State Department official put it, a worldwide judgments convention would help "lay the legal structure necessary to support the growth of global markets, promote sensible international legal cooperation, and provide for the general well-being of all our societies." (6) Although a United Nations convention (7) has successfully regulated enforcement of arbitral contracts and agreements since 1958, the United States, unlike many European countries, (8) is not yet a party to any treaty regarding the enforcement of judgments. (9)

The first draft of the Hague Convention was more comprehensive, (10) but it ultimately proved too controversial; (11) after years of delays, the United States appeared ready to abandon the project. (12) In order to salvage the negotiations, the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference, together with an informal working group, proposed that the Convention be scaled down to address only choice of court agreements between businesses, leaving many of the broader jurisdictional and enforcement provisions on the cutting room floor. (13) On this advice, the Hague Conference resurrected a leaner version of the original draft, and in June 2005, all of the member states approved it as the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. (14)

With the stated objective of "promot[ing] international trade and investment through enhanced judicial co-operation," (15) the Convention applies solely to "international cases [of] exclusive choice of court agreements concluded in civil or commercial matters." (16) Significantly, it pertains only to business-to-business transactions; consumer contracts and contracts of employment are specifically excluded. (17)

Three basic rules--fettered with many restrictions--form the foundation of the Convention. First, a court designated in an exclusive choice of court agreement "shall not decline to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that the dispute should be decided in a court of another State." (18) Second, the inverse also applies: any court not designated in the exclusive forum selection agreement must refuse jurisdiction. (19) Third, state parties must enforce judgments resulting from an exclusive choice of court agreement. (20) A fourth, optional provision allows states to declare that they will recognize and enforce judgments rendered by courts of other contracting states designated in nonexclusive choice of court agreements.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Private International Law - Civil Procedure - Hague Conference Approves Uniform Rules of Enforcement for International Forum Selection Clauses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.