Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Evaluating Decision Support Systems for PPGIS Applications

By Aggett, Graeme; McColl, Chris | Cartography and Geographic Information Science, January 2006 | Go to article overview

Evaluating Decision Support Systems for PPGIS Applications


Aggett, Graeme, McColl, Chris, Cartography and Geographic Information Science


Graeme Aggett and Chris McColl

Introduction

Involving the public during the development of alternative land-use scenarios leads to a more sustainable, legitimate, and democratic decision-making process and more effective land-use plans (Abbot et al. 1998; Al-Kodmany 2001). Geographic information systems (GIS) have been found effective in the facilitation of continuous public participation by providing an opportunity for citizens to contribute complementary knowledge, review technical data, visualize development proposals, and subjectively test the validity of assumptions that underpin many spatial planning decisions (Forrester et al. 1999; Al-Kodmany 2001; Ventura et al. 2002). The inclusion of GIS technology in decision-making processes as a tool to engage, blend public knowledge and concerns with expert information, and ultimately empower citizens, has developed into a broad body of research generally referred to as public participatory geographic information systems (PPGIS) (Nyerges et al. 1997; Harris and Weiner 1998; King 2002).

The PPGIS research has closely examined the social implications that may arise due to the application of GIS technology to decision-making processes involving marginalized communities (Obermeyer 1998; Craig et al. 2002; Warren 2004). Cautionary issues have arisen noting the negative impacts PPGIS could have upon differentiated social groups within communities. For example, inequitable access to the information, technology, and expertise of GIS could potentially disadvantage the ability of small or less wealthy groups to fully engage in decision-making processes where spatial analyses have been used to validate decisions (Harris and Weiner 1998; Elwood and Ghose 2001; Ghose 2003).

Additionally, PPGIS research has focused considerable attention to applying PPGIS frameworks that can more effectively engage and empower citizens during the public decision-making process (Elwood and Ghose 9001; Kyem 2001; Sedogo and Groten 9002). However, existing GIS technologies used within public participatory contexts have limited abilities to support decision-making processes due to a lack of system transparency, the need for expert training, the cost of hardware/ software, limited visualization capabilities, and inaccessibility of required data (Barndt 1998; Elwood and Leitner 1998; Al-Kodmany 2001). To address these short-comings, modified GIS tools have been developed to support successful PPGIS applications for democratic decision making. Several terms are used to describe these modified geographical information and communication technologies, such as spatial decision support systems (SDSS); decision support systems (DSS); and in some instances, planning support systems (PSS) (Jankowski and Nyerges 2001; Klosterman 2001; Geertman 2002). Herein we refer to these systems collectively as DSS instruments.

Increasingly, DSS are tightly coupled with, and/or developed upon, GIS platforms to better address the spatial decision-making processes of local governments and communities, and to support growing numbers of PPGIS practitioners (Brail 2001; Geertman 2002). Decision support system development has focused on integrating the analytical capabilities of GIS, including improved visualization technology, which operates within a "real-time" format to promote and support public debate (Shifter 1998; Jankowski and Nyerges 2001; Geertman 2002). These modified GIS instruments are developed with the intention of creating systems that are more transparent to users rather than the so-called "black box" systems, a label GIS has often fallen prey to (Klosterman 2001; Drew 2003).

Attempts have been made to design DSS to be easily understood and operated by users and flexible in application. Superior graphic and visualization capabilities have been incorporated to promote clearer communication of ideas (Al-Kodmany 2001; Geertman 2002; Haklay and Tobon 2003). These rapid advances have raised many questions regarding the development of new DSS and their ability to support PPGIS applications, including the following:

* How effective are emerging DSS at supporting various stages of participatory decision making, not only in terms of functionality hut also utility?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Evaluating Decision Support Systems for PPGIS Applications
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.