The Origin of Alien Faces: Examining Malmstrom's Template: Exploring Errors and Options in Abductees' Experiences of Alien Faces

By Witts, Ben; Buchanan, Jeff | Skeptic (Altadena, CA), Summer 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Origin of Alien Faces: Examining Malmstrom's Template: Exploring Errors and Options in Abductees' Experiences of Alien Faces


Witts, Ben, Buchanan, Jeff, Skeptic (Altadena, CA)


In "Close Encounters of the Facial Kind" (Vol. 11 No. 4), Frederick Malmstrom argues that an explanation behind the consistency of alien facial features (e.g. large eyes, slender nose) may be that abductees are drawing upon the influence of an inborn female prototypical face template. While Malmstrom presents some very well formed arguments to support this theory, we feel that there may be some additional explanations that need to be addressed. We will look at aspects of hypnogognic (hallucination inducing state between wakefulness and sleeping) and hypnopompic (hallucination inducing state between sleeping and waking) hallucinations, social expectations regarding alien facial patterns, the idea of a prototypical face template, and how these elements may be used to explain the commonality of alien faces reported by abductees.

Hallucinations and Regressions

Malmstrom notes that the majority of abductees recall their abduction through hypnogognic and hypnopompic hallucinations, or while under the influence of regression therapy. Concerning the former, one would need to show consistency in the events and scenes experienced to purport that a common mechanism is at work here. That is, in order to claim that a facial template is being accessed during these states, one would have to show that many hallucinations produce facial images and that there is consistency to these images. Regarding regression techniques, one would need to show the validity of regression before one could even begin to use them to account for the commonality in alien facial experiences.

A brief review of the literature shows that a common theme does not run through the experiences of those who have had hypnogognic and hypnopompic hallucinations) If all who claimed an abduction experience saw the same features (e.g. large almond eyes, enlarged cranium, thin nose) we would agree with Malmstrom that these experiences are tapping into a template, which he claims focuses mainly on the eyes and the nose. I (Ben) personally have experienced some terrifying hypnopompic hallucinations. For many years I had a reoccurring hallucination in which a tall man in a dark trench coat and black hat stood above me in my room. I never saw his eyes, or his nose for that matter, which clearly does not match Malmstrom's expectations. While anecdotes are not evidence, it is perhaps at least suggestive that the prototypical facial template may not be at work in all cases, or, if it is, it focuses on features other than the large eyes and thin nose supposedly seen by newborns.

Another important thing to note about hallucinations is that they are not consistent throughout history. In other eras, the intruder may have been demons such as the incubi or succubi. Even in the present, cultural differences can be quite dramatic, such as the widespread case of the "Old Hag" seen in Newfoundland. (2) And as for the aliens themselves, they can differ quite dramatically from the typical "gray" that is reported amongst abductees. Some other types include reptilian and metallic abductors.

When dealing with regression, one needs to go no further than to demonstrate the unreliability of memories created within a regression context in order to dismiss it as a source of data from which to draw. Since it is not too difficult to find literature supporting this idea (3), we must conclude that, at best (for the believers), the majority of abductions recalled under hypnotic regressions are merely caused by the influence of a credulous hypnotherapist. If there is no validity to regression techniques, then using them for research purposes seems pointless at best and misleadingly dangerous at worst.

Prototype Face Template

What Malmstrom failed to note in his article was that there could be an alternative explanation for an infant's attention to the human face. In the same research article by Bushnell (4) that Malmstrom cites, the author notes other research that contradicts Malmstrom's argument.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Origin of Alien Faces: Examining Malmstrom's Template: Exploring Errors and Options in Abductees' Experiences of Alien Faces
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?