Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Science without Borders

By: Shermer, Michael | Skeptic (Altadena, CA), Summer 2005 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Science without Borders


Shermer, Michael, Skeptic (Altadena, CA)


The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality by His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Morgan Road Books/Random House. 2005, 209 pp. $24.95 ISBN: 0-7679-2066-X.

IN A 1987 LECTURE IN PASADENA, CA, on "The Burden of Skepticism," the astronomer Carl Sagan opined: "In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion."

Well, Carl, here's a little bit of good news on the religion front, from no less a personage than His Holiness the Dalai Lama, who writes in the Prologue of his latest book, The Universe in a Single Atom: "My confidence in venturing into science lies in my basic belief that as in science so in Buddhism, understanding the nature of reality is pursued by means of critical investigation: if scientific analysis were conclusively to demonstrate certain claims in Buddhism to be false, then we must accept the findings of science and abandon those claims." Listen up, all ye who insist on forcing the round peg of science into the square hole of religion (creationists and Intelligent Design Theorists most notably): religious claims may or may not be consonant with scientific findings, but if they are not, it is wisest to err on the side of science because it employs a method that includes self-correcting machinery designed to weed out error, agenda, and bias.

Not only do scientists change their minds in the teeth of new and contradictory evidence, they do so regardless of the religion, race, or nationality of the scientific colleagues who are doing the contradicting. Science is …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?