A Straight T and Very Narrow Utopia; an Exhibition at the V&A Reveals That Modernism - Whimsical, Shoddy, Charmless - Was as Deficient in Practice as in Theory

The Evening Standard (London, England), April 7, 2006 | Go to article overview

A Straight T and Very Narrow Utopia; an Exhibition at the V&A Reveals That Modernism - Whimsical, Shoddy, Charmless - Was as Deficient in Practice as in Theory


Byline: BRIAN SEWELL

MODERNISM is a portmanteau term and, like the portmanteau of the baggage world, it expands to accommodate whatever is stuffed into it until - as now - it bulges so much that it splits its seams. No institution

is better qualified to unpack it than the V&A Museum, that stern guardian of the territory between art and craft, the beautifully useless and the functionally useful, to discard what is simply Thirties kitsch and tainted by Art Deco, and puritanically reassert that Modernism in its day occupied the moral high ground of design and art.

Modernism, so the rhetoric goes, was the visible expression of ideal societies that were to be compliant and obedient, egalitarian and conformist, the Brave New World of Nineteen Eighty-Four, the architecture of which, eschewing decoration and embellishment, must be clean and functional, constructed with methods and materials contemporary and adventurous - and as for art, that must, of course, be meaningless and abstract.

"Utopia" was the movement's shibboleth, not whispered, but shouted from rooftops that were, inevitably, flat.

What was its day? Did it begin with the architecture of the Viennese Secession early in the 20th century, slowly developing and then degrading the idiom, dragging on until we built the Royal Festival Hall half that century later? The authorities of the V&A, in mounting what they propose is an encyclopaedic exhibition, give it only a quarter of a century, the years 1914 to 1939, but so brief a concentration, in eliminating both its first tentative spring shoots and its dying autumn leaves, distorts its history.

Enthusiasm for it in Britain was slow to grow among the general public, but its priesthood of theorists were powerful and obdurate, their acolytes here unquestioning, and as a consequence its dying years were very long drawn out.

One thing is certain - that the gross destruction of much that was Modernist during the Second World War did not put an end to it and that Modernism was the most widespread influence on post-war reconstruction throughout Europe; three lesser manifestations of Modernist design are still within the experience of most of us - the Crittall window, the Zimmer frame and the Routemaster bus.

European Modernism was nourished by the Russian Revolution. This, combined with the effects of the First World War, radically disturbed, even destroyed the class structures and economies of the West, and to the existing orders of art, architecture and taste, they were equally disruptive - bourgeois Salons and Academies were never again secure, Cubism was wiped out, Impressionism and its offshoots were mired in decadent repetition; after the war, and nurtured by it, only German Expressionism survived, though Futurism, exhausted in Italy, was to spawn a spiritual heir in Russia. There the independent responses to political change were Constructivism and its offshoot Suprematism, the latter a form of abstract art that, based on elementary geometrical shapes, expressed nothing and had no useful or usable purpose; the former, on the other hand, clearly expressed a socio-political ideal and was often useful in its application. As the communist poet Vladimir Mayakovsky put it, perhaps echoing the Futurists: "We do not need a dead mausoleum of art where dead works are worshipped, but a living factory of the human spirit - in the streets, the tramways and the factories, in workshops and the homes of workers." It is in this that we sense the release of art into the useful thing, the car, the chair, the teapot and, above all, the house, factory and public building.

In Germany, Peter Behrens (born 1868), pioneer architect in new materials and glass before the First World War, and with a substantial number of Modernist industrial buildings to his credit destroyed in the Second (he died in 1940 and thus fits both the V&A's date bracket and mine but is ignored in the exhibition), expressed perfectly most of the aims of Modernism.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Straight T and Very Narrow Utopia; an Exhibition at the V&A Reveals That Modernism - Whimsical, Shoddy, Charmless - Was as Deficient in Practice as in Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.