Spondylus Shell Ornaments from Late Neolithic Dimini, Greece: Specialized Manufacture or Unequal Accumulation?

By Halstead, Paul | Antiquity, September 1993 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Spondylus Shell Ornaments from Late Neolithic Dimini, Greece: Specialized Manufacture or Unequal Accumulation?

Halstead, Paul, Antiquity

Rings and buttons and beads cut from the marine shell, Spondylus gaederopus, are among the most distinctive exchange items of Neolithic Europe. From sources on the coast of the Mediterranean, these highly valued objects were widely distributed across central Europe. A re-examination of the nature and contexts of shell objects and manufacturing waste at Dimini, a key late Neolithic site on the coast of northern Greece, explores their social role within a Spondylus-working community.

Dimini and its society

The status of Dimini as a chronological typesite for the Greek Neolithic has diminished in recent years: the 'Classic Dimini' ceramic assemblage, probably dating to the early 5th millennium BC (Theochares 1973: 119; Weisshaar 1989: 139), now defines only the last of four or five subdivisions of the Late Neolithic of eastern Thessaly. Dimini provides a unique insight into late Neolithic society, however, because of the extensive scale of excavation at the site. Excavation at the beginning of the century revealed a late Neolithic settlement covering c. 1 hectare and consisting of a series of concentric circuit walls around a 'central court' (Tsountas 1908). Re-excavation in the 1970s demonstrated that the circuit walls (previously interpreted as defensive) divide the settlement into 'domestic areas', each containing a few buildings and a range of storage and cooking facilities (Hourmouziadis 1979). The central court is dominated by a three-roomed 'megaron', which has more or less close counterparts at other late Neolithic settlements in eastern Thessaly. These central megaron buildings suggest the emergence of an institutionalized elite during the Late Neolithic (Theochares 1973; Halstead 1989), prompting the search for evidence of unequal access to resources within the settlement at Dimini.

It has been argued that tools and food refuse are widely distributed at Dimini, reflecting the ready availability of necessary raw materials prior to the adoption of metal for essential equipment (Hourmouziadis 1979; 1980; 1981). Faunal evidence likewise suggests that each domestic area (including the central court) pursued a broadly similar strategy of animal exploitation, or at any rate consumed broadly similar animal products (Halstead 1992a). These studies perhaps imply that late Neolithic Dimini was a 'rank' society (Fried 1967), with the megaron elite having privileged access to high status, but not to basic resources. In such societies, 'no conspicuous specialization of craftsmanship' is expected (Fried 1967: 115), but Tsuneki (1989) has claimed that particular domestic areas at Dimini specialized in the production of shell ornaments for export. Tsuneki's evidence is here reviewed and reinterpreted.

Spondylus at Dimini

Dimini is situated in the small coastal plain of Volos (FIGURE 1), close to the late Neolithic coastline (Zangger 1991). The marine shell assemblage from the recent excavations by Hourmouziadis contains c. 500 worked items, of which almost half are of Spondylus gaederopus (Tsuneki 1989: 4, figure 3). Spondylus was evidently prized as a raw material: c. 60% of Spondylus finds were worked, compared with c. 4--7% for other common species (Tsuneki 1989: 5, figure 4). The thinner and more easily worked left valve of Spondylus was strongly preferred for the manufacture of shell rings and the thick right valve for small objects such as buttons and cylinder beads (Tsuneki 1989: 12, figure 8). The working of Spondylus was far more elaborate than that of other species and Tsuneki was able to distinguish waste from the production of shell rings and smaller objects (1989: 7--12).


Finds of apparently finished Spondylus shell objects are heavily concentrated in two different parts of the settlement (FIGURE 2). Of 74 ring fragments of known provenance, 45 (61%) come from House N in Domestic Area A and a further five from an adjacent yard. Of 143 buttons, 122 (85%) come from a probable yard area in the middle of Domestic Area C, as do six of the eight cylinder beads found (Tsuneki 1989: 8, table 1).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Spondylus Shell Ornaments from Late Neolithic Dimini, Greece: Specialized Manufacture or Unequal Accumulation?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?